Teams

KNO NAVY

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-14vs VCC TEALSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesNaomi Arellano / Tyler Rockefeller vs Amy Bergan / Sarah Esther3-6, 3-6
W#2 Female SinglesSara Knudsen vs Kayla Kelly6-0, 7-5
2025-07-07vs KC-RH YELLOWWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSara Knudsen / Tyler Rockefeller vs Mallory Clark / Gabriela Wakulchik6-1, 6-1
2025-06-30vs HV YELLOWWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesSara Knudsen vs Hannah Quintana6-2, 6-4
2025-06-23vs HRCA-N TEALWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesSara Knudsen vs Rebecca Mendoza6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-16vs SS-D TEALWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesTyler Rockefeller / Sara Knudsen vs Monica Feldman / Cheris Berlinberg6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KNO NAVY601715100
2CACM PINK6014411109
3NJ NAVY5111717158
4VCC TEAL4211717144
5HV YELLOW4210818140
6CHCC YELLOW339918155
7KC-RH YELLOW3371123172
8SS-G ORANGE2471125191
9DTP GREEN1561225176
10DTC GREEN1561225172
11HRCA-N TEAL1561226173
12SS-D TEAL1551329195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jenni Young
published
3.23
Tyler Rockefeller
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Sara Knudsen
usually #1 Female Doubles 40%, also #2 Female Singles 40% · published 3
2.93
Victoria Greene
published
2.86
Naomi Arellano
published
Ilana Bellowe
published 3
2.52
Jodi Page
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Knudsen + Tyler Rockefeller7361% games+14.1% vs expected
Jodi Page + Jenni Young8258% games+4.1% vs expected
Jenni Young + Ilana Bellowe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenni Young
59W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Tyler Rockefeller
24W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Sara Knudsen
37W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Victoria Greene
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Naomi Arellano
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Ilana Bellowe
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jodi Page
42W–38L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.