← Teams

PTC-Albano/Kopack

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristen Kopack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.77
May Albano
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.72
Christy Strange
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.56
Gabriela McIntosh
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.54
Leah Buxman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Gina Ossanna
published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Schwarz
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-06-14Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesKirsten Holmes / Christy Strange vs Pat Kaplan / Laura Greenberg6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMay Albano vs JANE LENG1-3
W#2 DoublesLeah Buxman / Sara van Beckum vs Susan Eldridge / Toni Eastwood6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristen Kopack / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Michelle Cole / Suzanne Friedman6-3, 6-2
2019-06-08Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesMay Albano vs Carol Bietsch6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Strange / Leah Buxman vs JULIE ANDREWS / Julie Gorecki6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Carol Adams / Louanne Fuller6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2019-06-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Alyssa Wong vs Aleli Siruno / Seungja Shin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFiona Tait / Kristen Kopack vs Kristie Leake / Mary Marsh2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Nancy East Smith vs Robin Fernstrom / Siew Leng Toh6-3, 6-4
2019-05-17Won 2–1
W#2 DoublesFiona Tait / Kristen Kopack vs Judy Potts / Emily Cohen6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLeah Buxman vs JANE LENG6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Schwarz / Gabriela McIntosh vs Laura Greenberg / Eunhee Heller6-4, 7-6
2019-05-11Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesCourtney Storrs / Christy Strange vs Colleen Golden / Karen Mott6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Kopack / Fiona Tait vs Shari Carver / Jody Phillips-Bourke6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLeah Buxman vs Linda Degnan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Sarah Yu vs Julie Job / Wendy Vaughn6-0, 6-0
2019-05-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Nancy East Smith vs Susie Jansky / Rico McIver6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Kim Wright / Michele Desmarais6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKristen Kopack vs Pam Saftler6-3, 6-1
2019-04-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Alyssa Wong vs Barbara Hart / Heather Zadow6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMay Albano vs Gretchen Dumestre6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Amy Marks / Marianne Conroy6-2, 6-0
2019-04-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Courtney Storrs vs Aleli Siruno / Seungja Shin6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesFiona Tait / Kristen Kopack vs Julie Legassick / Robin Fernstrom2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Dolores Corley / Bin He6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kristen Kopack
70W–45L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
May Albano
62W–52L career
1%99%1%
3.77
4
Christy Strange
89W–67L career
1%98%0%
3.72
4
Gabriela McIntosh
111W–90L career
18%82%0%
3.56
4
Leah Buxman
113W–106L career
23%77%0%
3.54
3.5
Gina Ossanna
33W–61L career
0%92%7%
3.37
3.5
Elizabeth Schwarz
49W–46L career
17%83%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.