Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 6.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesEren Erkalkan / Rohan Salantry vs Laks Varathan / Gopikrishna Karuturi6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJ Patrick Forden / Tom Kermoian vs Venkatesan Chandran / Munish Gautam4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSreevisakh Muraleedharan / Tony LaFrance vs Sivakumar Manickavasagam / Anandaradje Auguste6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesEren Erkalkan / Nayeem Shah vs Deepak Jayakumar / Anandaradje Auguste6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlaettin Altug Keciciler / Dale Welsh vs Laks Varathan / Gopi Bhagavathula6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDerek Daymond / Joseph Momich vs Sivakumar Manickavasagam / Satish Mopur6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelvin Chua / Steve Zalewski vs John Boral / Ankitesh Singh1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Eren Erkalkan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Thinh Vo
published
3.55
Nayeem Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Nadir Zaidi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Rudy Haluza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Sreevisakh Muraleedharan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Derek Daymond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Alaettin Altug Keciciler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Dale Welsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Andrey Izmaylov
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Joseph Momich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Shankar Krishna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Tom Kermoian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Rohan Salantry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Tony LaFrance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Alan Biocca
published 3
3.08
J Patrick Forden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Patrick Wong
published
2.94
Divya Dixit
published
2.85
Chandra Mundra
published 3
2.72
Kaveh Moraghebi
published
2.42
Steve Zalewski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Kermoian + Chandra Mundra5264% games+14.6% vs expected
Joseph Momich + Tom Kermoian4262% games+9.9% vs expected
J Patrick Forden + Dale Welsh1440% games−2.2% vs expected
Andrey Izmaylov + Dale Welsh224 matchesnot enough data
J Patrick Forden + Eren Erkalkan033 matchesnot enough data
Alan Biocca + Tom Kermoian303 matchesnot enough data
Tom Kermoian + Tony LaFrance123 matchesnot enough data
Tony LaFrance + Chandra Mundra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eren Erkalkan
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Thinh Vo
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Nayeem Shah
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Nadir Zaidi
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Rudy Haluza
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Sreevisakh Muraleedharan
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Derek Daymond
20W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Alaettin Altug Keciciler
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Dale Welsh
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Andrey Izmaylov
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Joseph Momich
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Shankar Krishna
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
Tom Kermoian
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Rohan Salantry
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Tony LaFrance
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Alan Biocca
16W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
J Patrick Forden
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Patrick Wong
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Divya Dixit
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Chandra Mundra
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
Kaveh Moraghebi
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Steve Zalewski
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.