Teams

Double Bypass/Ferraro-Green/Porter

2026 Mixed 55+ SFV Fall · SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD

16 players · average NTRP 2.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 13 5:30 PM
Burbank Tennis Center
Sep 20 3:00 PM
Porter Valley Country Club
Sep 27 5:30 PM
Burbank Tennis Center
Oct 11 5:30 PM
Burbank Tennis Center
Nov 1 4:00 PM
Porter Valley Country Club
L#1 DoublesEdward Cabrera / Savina Kollmorgen vs Aldo Angrisani / Liz Rosman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick McDuff / Angie Wu vs David Buik / Sarah Scott4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRick Gordon / Karen Crosby vs Scott Carrithers / Molly Jackson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racketeers/Peralta-Angrisani/Burbank000000
2Double Bypass/Ferraro-Green/Porter000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Dan Lula
published 3.5
3.17
Ken Green
published
3.12
Edward Cabrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Rick Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Maarit Fenwick
published
2.76
Cary Minovitz
published 3
2.74
Angie Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Cobe Crosby
published 3
2.62
Debbi Dixon
published 3
2.60
Karen Crosby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Chung Mi Ferraro
published 2.5
2.48
Laurie Patterson
published
2.45
Savina Kollmorgen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Anna Boyadjian
published 3
2.21
Dan Kollmorgen
published 2.5
Kyung Min
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Green + Laurie Patterson6056% gamesnot enough data
Karen Crosby + Cobe Crosby134 matchesnot enough data
Savina Kollmorgen + Dan Kollmorgen044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Lula
138W–81L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Ken Green
18W–9L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Edward Cabrera
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Rick Gordon
0W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Maarit Fenwick
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Cary Minovitz
3W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Angie Wu
7W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cobe Crosby
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Debbi Dixon
10W–16L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Karen Crosby
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Chung Mi Ferraro
6W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
Laurie Patterson
8W–16L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.48
Savina Kollmorgen
1W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
3
Anna Boyadjian
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.33
2.5
Dan Kollmorgen
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Kyung Min
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.