Teams

Racketeers/Peralta-Angrisani/Burbank

2026 Mixed 55+ SFV Fall · SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 13 5:30 PM
Burbank Tennis Center
Sep 20 3:00 PM
Porter Valley Country Club
Sep 27 5:30 PM
Burbank Tennis Center
Oct 11 5:30 PM
Burbank Tennis Center
Nov 1 4:00 PM
Porter Valley Country Club
W#1 DoublesAldo Angrisani / Liz Rosman vs Edward Cabrera / Savina Kollmorgen6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesScott Carrithers / Molly Jackson vs Rick Gordon / Karen Crosby6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racketeers/Peralta-Angrisani/Burbank000000
2Double Bypass/Ferraro-Green/Porter000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Aldo Angrisani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Bruce Lilly
published 3.5
2.94
Diane Audeon
published 3
2.90
Diep Ho
published 3
2.83
Scott Carrithers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Jeffrey Korerat
published
2.70
Letty King
published
2.66
Molly Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Ameline Suson
published 3
2.60
Pamela Bentley
published
2.43
Liz Rosman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
2.29
1.95
Jacqueline Hantgan
published 2.5
Liberty Peralta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aldo Angrisani + Liz Rosman4169% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Korerat + Letty King314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aldo Angrisani
93W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Bruce Lilly
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Diane Audeon
48W–72L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Diep Ho
20W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Scott Carrithers
13W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Jeffrey Korerat
16W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Letty King
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Ameline Suson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
Pamela Bentley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Liz Rosman
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
3
Ganga Chandramohan
2W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.39
Raquelle de la Rocha
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Jacqueline Hantgan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Liberty Peralta
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.