Teams

DCC/Filgo W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-21vs Lakewood/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.5Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMegan Filgo / Sarah Klein vs Alexandra Klitsch / Allison Methvin1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesClaire Arnot vs Mandy Stewart4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGenny Montgomery / Daley Bennett vs Brooke McGonigle / Sarah Patterson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Carlson / Destin Shore vs Mindy Satterwhite / Jill Newman1-6, 1-6
2025-03-07vs High Point/Tucker W3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesMolly Fernandes / Julie Meyer vs Celeste Schmidt / Cindy Graham4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesClaire Arnot vs Katie Kilmer6-4, 7-5
2025-02-28vs McKinney/Legault-Hedblom W3.5Split 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Klein / Molly Thomas vs Lauren Newby / April Richardson6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesClaire Arnot vs Adrienne Roberts7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmily Miller / Megan Filgo vs Danette Goodyear / Amanda Bodnar6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGenny Montgomery / Mary Clayton Crow vs Tammi Cole / Laya Gan0-6, 0-6
2025-02-26vs Springpark/Eubank-Middlebrook W3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Stensrud / Genny Montgomery vs Karen Eubanks / Amy Northrop1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDestin Shore / Megan Filgo vs Julie Richard / Loretta Middlebrook2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Barnes / Mary Clayton Crow vs Karen Clemmons / Chin Su1-6, 4-6
2025-02-14vs LB Houston/Gregory-Lodewick W3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesMolly Fernandes / Allison Stensrud vs Kathleen Doepfner / Joanna Hernandez6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeth Smith / Claire Arnot vs Cindy Lodewick / Heather Garrison6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Clayton Crow / Julie Meyer vs Lauri Miller / Hollie Free6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-07vs Eldorado/Miller W3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Coats / Molly Thomas vs Lindsey Widtfeldt / July Crockett7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClaire Arnot vs Melissa Bell6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Klein / Megan Filgo vs Melissa Berg / MacKenzie Miller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDestin Shore / Allison Stensrud vs Amanda Jackson / Jennifer Paulson6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-01-31vs Lakes/Little-Akbany W3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Miller / Megan Filgo vs Kimberly DiNota / Kristi Flanagan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDestin Shore / Jennifer Carlson vs Tracy Akbany / Christie Rymsza1-6, 4-6
2025-01-24vs Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Coats / Genny Montgomery vs Sarah Clayton / Kim Velevis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllison Stensrud vs Rachel Ladin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Filgo / Emily Miller vs Wendy Kaplan / Carrie Song6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristy Barnes / Mary Clayton Crow vs Jennifer Chazanow / Debbie Katz3-6, 1-6
2025-01-17vs The Nelson/Stoll-Alexander W3.5Lost 13
L#1 DoublesGenny Montgomery / Molly Thomas vs Beckey Fuller / Rachel Stoll1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesClaire Arnot vs Stephanie Barna6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMegan Filgo / Allison Stensrud vs Jacie Vittitow / Ainsley Pierce1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDestin Shore / Emily Miller vs Clare Holbrook / Astyn Davis5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings39 teams · W3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Nelson/Stoll-Alexander W3.59029724265
2Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.58027513204
3Royal Oaks/Copley W3.58130618243
4Greenhill/Lipshy-Oujezdsky W3.581241229274
5RGAC/Lucas-Kirk W3.581251129284
6Lakes @ CH/Lewis-Boronski W3.571191329259
7DAC/Starnes-Wilson W3.572251126282
8Lakewood/Huffman-Satterwhite W3.572231332291
9Lakes/Little-Akbany W3.563201633265
10High Point/Tucker W3.563211535298
11High Point/Cavey W3.563211536324
12McKinney/Legault-Hedblom W3.563201638302
13Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.563191740341
14Greenhill/Thornton-Hark W3.553221024220
15Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.553201229252
16Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.554251128287
17Canyon Creek/Whitaker W3.554201636297
18Canyon Creek/Dawson W3.554201638321
19McKinney/Pike-Garza W3.554191739313
20Fretz/Buechel-Aiken W3.554162041317
21Stonebridge/Cantu W3.554181841336
22Oak Creek/Kendall-Wells W3.554181842327
23DAC/Frazure-Burns W3.544171534273
24Oak Creek/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.545181843352
25Brookhaven/Frenkel W3.535181434272
26High Point/Gomez W3.535102247326
27Las Colinas/DeMarque-Scopa W3.536112552373
28Lakewood/Cholerton-Carr W3.536122453381
29LB Houston/Gregory-Lodewick W3.527152145347
30Eldorado/Miller W3.527142247364
31Seay/Goelzer W3.527142248359
32DCC/Filgo W3.527142248346
33Garland/Biancardi-Hill W3.517102246330
34Wilkerson Sanders/McKee-Powell W3.518142248371
35Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.51892755353
36McKinney/Colston-Bowersox W3.518102655384
37Brookhaven/Musgrove-Hrnicek W3.518102657393
38Springpark/Eubank-Middlebrook W3.51863060401
39Gleneagles/Anderson-Rubenstein W3.50813162379

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Jennifer Coats
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.42
Claire Arnot
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.36
Molly Fernandes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Molly Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Laura McCullough
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Allison Stensrud
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Sarah Klein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Adair Webb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Genny Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Megan Filgo
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.00
Destin Shore
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.97
Daley Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Mary Clayton Crow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Baird
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McCullough + Adair Webb6072% games+16.6% vs expected
Megan Filgo + Sarah Klein1640% games−2.8% vs expected
Adair Webb + Daley Bennett314 matchesnot enough data
Destin Shore + Daley Bennett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Coats
19W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.67
3.5
Claire Arnot
11W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Molly Fernandes
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Molly Thomas
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Laura McCullough
19W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Allison Stensrud
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Klein
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Adair Webb
16W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.00
3.5
Genny Montgomery
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Megan Filgo
5W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Destin Shore
13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Daley Bennett
26W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Mary Clayton Crow
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Baird
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.