Teams

FD 7.0 WR Downing

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 7.0 NC1 Bullach7118618184
2FD 7.0 MM Mei7218921200
3FD 7.0 MV2 Smith7219826251
4FD 7.0 CC2 Sobecks63151228244
5FD 7.0 PM Leohr53131128208
6FD 7.0 NC2 Paulino4415921187
7FD 7.0 CC1 Meisenbach45161130245
8FD 7.0 MV1 Connell45121535251
9FD 7.0 WR Downing45101740296
10FD 7.0 BR Sweeney3591533215
11FD 7.0 LT McKenzie36131431263
12FD 7.0 TP Lynch1751940260
13FD 7.0 PW Merugu1852247308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Elizabeth van Dyke
published
3.34
Christopher Downing
published 3.5
3.31
Arminda Parker
published 3.5
3.28
Stephanie Sneed
published
3.25
Kelle DeBoth
published
Christine Davis
published 3.5
3.23
Dee Balkissoon
published 3.5
3.23
Derek Kohanski
published 3.5
3.16
Brittney Kohanski
published 3.5
3.15
Melissa Durbin
published
3.12
Sally Iuston
published
3.10
Jose Muzzi
published
3.00
Keith Curley
published
2.84
Marcia Roberts
published
2.84
Steven Parker
published
Steve Nutt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arminda Parker + Stephanie Sneed6259% games+4.5% vs expected
Derek Kohanski + Christopher Downing10653% games+4.2% vs expected
Melissa Durbin + Kelle DeBoth12651% games+3.6% vs expected
Stephanie Sneed + Sally Iuston553552% games+2.9% vs expected
Kelle DeBoth + Marcia Roberts7452% games+1.8% vs expected
Sally Iuston + Marcia Roberts5455% games+0.3% vs expected
Melissa Durbin + Sally Iuston2344% games−1.1% vs expected
Arminda Parker + Sally Iuston5544% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth van Dyke
26W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Christopher Downing
93W–82L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Arminda Parker
110W–112L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Stephanie Sneed
109W–87L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Kelle DeBoth
136W–77L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Christine Davis
43W–64L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dee Balkissoon
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Derek Kohanski
63W–79L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Brittney Kohanski
68W–63L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Melissa Durbin
62W–45L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Sally Iuston
103W–82L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jose Muzzi
49W–48L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Keith Curley
21W–36L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Marcia Roberts
136W–128L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.84
Steven Parker
43W–81L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.84
Steve Nutt
77W–74L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.