Teams

FD 7.0 BR Sweeney

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 7.0 NC1 Bullach7118618184
2FD 7.0 MM Mei7218921200
3FD 7.0 MV2 Smith7219826251
4FD 7.0 CC2 Sobecks63151228244
5FD 7.0 PM Leohr53131128208
6FD 7.0 NC2 Paulino4415921187
7FD 7.0 CC1 Meisenbach45161130245
8FD 7.0 MV1 Connell45121535251
9FD 7.0 WR Downing45101740296
10FD 7.0 BR Sweeney3591533215
11FD 7.0 LT McKenzie36131431263
12FD 7.0 TP Lynch1751940260
13FD 7.0 PW Merugu1852247308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Nathaniel Brahler
published
J Britton Morrow
published 3.5
3.22
Francie Morrow
published 3.5
3.22
Kim Swallen
published
3.21
Kristin Zalenski
published
3.20
Drew Swallen
published 3
3.16
Sara Timken
published
3.13
David Tsai
published 3
3.08
Traci Tsai
published
3.06
Robert Timken
published
3.05
Fred Zalenski
published 3.5
2.93
Kelly Sweeney
published
2.75
Rachel Brahler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Sweeney + Kim Swallen9070% games+22.8% vs expected
Traci Tsai + Kim Swallen6171% games+13.8% vs expected
Kelly Sweeney + Francie Morrow17858% games+10.7% vs expected
Sara Timken + Kristin Zalenski9954% games+8.1% vs expected
Sara Timken + Rachel Brahler3449% games+7.4% vs expected
Francie Morrow + Kristin Zalenski16653% games+7.2% vs expected
Kelly Sweeney + Traci Tsai6851% games+6.4% vs expected
Nathaniel Brahler + Robert Timken4346% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathaniel Brahler
36W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
J Britton Morrow
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Francie Morrow
146W–83L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Kim Swallen
33W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Kristin Zalenski
63W–71L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Drew Swallen
17W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.20
Sara Timken
143W–133L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
David Tsai
56W–90L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.13
Traci Tsai
119W–116L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Robert Timken
34W–65L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Fred Zalenski
19W–34L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kelly Sweeney
105W–120L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Rachel Brahler
51W–72L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.