Teams

FD 7.0 PW Merugu

2024 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles

18 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Fusion Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FD 7.0 NC1 Bullach7118618184
2FD 7.0 MM Mei7218921200
3FD 7.0 MV2 Smith7219826251
4FD 7.0 CC2 Sobecks63151228244
5FD 7.0 PM Leohr53131128208
6FD 7.0 NC2 Paulino4415921187
7FD 7.0 CC1 Meisenbach45161130245
8FD 7.0 MV1 Connell45121535251
9FD 7.0 WR Downing45101740296
10FD 7.0 BR Sweeney3591533215
11FD 7.0 LT McKenzie36131431263
12FD 7.0 TP Lynch1751940260
13FD 7.0 PW Merugu1852247308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Cristine Torek
published 3.5
Angela Cicero
published 3.5
3.24
Mark Tabora
published
3.23
Allison Austin
published 3.5
3.21
Aiden N Stasek
published 3.5
3.14
Doug Michelsen
published
3.05
Sean Schulze
published
3.01
Ann Dewerth
published 3.5
2.87
Kajal Herman
published
2.73
Ryan Kowalski
published
2.69
Jessica Merugu
published
2.66
2.59
Carmen Iditoiu
published 3
2.53
Cheryl Trzcinski
published 3
Michael Torek
published
Shukri Tarakji
published
Stuart Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristine Torek + Allison Austin5548% games+6.2% vs expected
Mark Tabora + Doug Michelsen4453% games+3.3% vs expected
Cheryl Trzcinski + Kajal Herman4451% games+1.5% vs expected
Jessica Merugu + Cheryl Trzcinski0833% games−7.0% vs expected
Jessica Merugu + Kajal Herman4349% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Iditoiu + Kajal Herman2355% gamesnot enough data
Doug Michelsen + Sean Schulze4157% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Iditoiu + Jessica Merugu134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cristine Torek
53W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Angela Cicero
36W–41L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Tabora
44W–39L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Allison Austin
67W–52L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Aiden N Stasek
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Doug Michelsen
80W–69L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Sean Schulze
34W–35L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Ann Dewerth
58W–69L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kajal Herman
37W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Christopher Rodriguez
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Kowalski
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Jessica Merugu
34W–62L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Cristina Brauchla
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Carmen Iditoiu
15W–35L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Cheryl Trzcinski
30W–70L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Michael Torek
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shukri Tarakji
30W–63L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stuart Scott
55W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.