Teams

Causing A Racquet

2021 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-29vs AndersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Bursiek / Marian Joh vs Kirstin Anderson / Michelle Cahill4-6, 3-6
2021-07-23vs Team-CP-Gals (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Crews / Elizabeth Fletcher vs Tracy Qi / Maggie Xu4-6, 3-6
2021-07-21vs Green/BlochLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Crews / Elizabeth Fletcher vs Sydney Bloch / Paige Green1-6, 5-7
2021-06-17vs ScottWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Fletcher / Catherine Bursiek vs Amanda Weaver / Amy Quilter6-3, 6-2
2021-06-09vs You've Been Served!Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Bursiek / Elizabeth Fletcher vs Megan Bigbee / Annie Kistner6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Elizabeth Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.61
Catherine Bursiek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Marian Joh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Katherine Crews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Bursiek + Elizabeth Fletcher21558% games+5.6% vs expected
Katherine Crews + Elizabeth Fletcher134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Fletcher
50W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Catherine Bursiek
129W–69L career · 3 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Marian Joh
124W–67L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Katherine Crews
86W–62L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.