Teams

Hulburt-Baby Got Backhand

2022 One Doubles-Winter · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-26vs DizonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharae Hulburt / Sara Simonson vs Nikki Dizon / Cristina Stormans6-3, 6-4
2022-03-06vs JMonsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesTamara Rosenbloom / Chino Mclaughlin vs Julie Monson / MAIMAI BENSON3-6, 4-6
2022-03-03vs Hewitt-Rowley SistersWon 10
W#1 DoublesChino Mclaughlin / Tamara Rosenbloom vs Wendy Clarke / Kelly Hewitt6-3, 6-1
2022-02-26vs Clerget-Not My FaultWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharae Hulburt / Chino Mclaughlin vs Violet Clerget / Chun Saul6-2, 7-6
2022-02-24vs Clerget-Not My FaultWon 10
W#1 DoublesTamara Rosenbloom / Sara Simonson vs Regina Phinney / Angi Bradley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-21vs JMonsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharae Hulburt / Sara Simonson vs MAIMAI BENSON / Shirley Shen6-3, 7-5
2022-02-17vs Russell(3.5)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChino Mclaughlin / Tamara Rosenbloom vs Mika Russell / Vicki Moll4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Russell(3.5)7070263
2WinterKoeppen7171358
3Berry-Victorious Secret7171359
4KTAC-Fossum6262450
5JMonson5252450
6Hulburt-Baby Got Backhand5252560
7Hunter/Jones35351075
8Rock/Rea35351285
9Clerget-Not My Fault25251070
10Dizon25251175
11Herrick-Nuts for the Net26261288
12Hewitt-Rowley Sisters07071486
13Mazikowski-Maz and Partners08081697

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Sara Simonson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Tamara Rosenbloom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Chino Mclaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Charae Hulburt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Rosenbloom + Sara Simonson6159% games+0.7% vs expected
Chino Mclaughlin + Tamara Rosenbloom2349% games−4.1% vs expected
Chino Mclaughlin + Sara Simonson213 matchesnot enough data
Charae Hulburt + Tamara Rosenbloom213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sara Simonson
197W–85L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
4.06
3.5
Tamara Rosenbloom
190W–151L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Chino Mclaughlin
164W–149L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Charae Hulburt
156W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.