Teams

Lee

2024 Baltimore Tri-Level 18 & Over · Baltimore Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-07vs BALTIMORE - BakerWon 10
W#3 DoublesTy Cronin / Jennifer Exelby vs Kim Steffen / Beth van Derslice2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-05vs Tri-VissernetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Jennifer Exelby vs Danielle Barry / Kristie Baynard4-6, 4-6
2024-07-31vs BALTIMORE - BakerWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Exelby / Kimberly Sandhu vs Lynne Cramer / Eva Simmons-O'Brien6-2, 6-2
2024-07-29vs Tri-VissernetsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Edwards / Jennifer Exelby vs Rebecca Stewart / Shrijoyee Ray4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-07-23vs BALTIMORE - BakerLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoan Garlow / Vicki Williamson vs Christine Ioannou / Susan Sibol3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Karin Davis vs Kimberly Ford / Kim Steffen2-6, 5-7
2024-07-08vs BALTIMORE - BakerWon 20
W#2 DoublesKimberly Sandhu / Joan Garlow vs Anna Culiner / Christine Ioannou0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Ty Cronin vs Lynne Cramer / Beth van Derslice6-2, 6-1
2024-07-02vs Tri-VissernetsWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Karin Davis vs Loan Nguyen / Shrijoyee Ray6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Vicki Williamson
published
4.11
Jennifer Cullum
published 4.5
3.99
Rosanne Murphy
published
3.86
Virginia Fung
published
3.86
Kimberly Sandhu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Jennifer Exelby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Jessica Walsh
published
3.80
Joan Garlow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Kate Dempsey
published
3.58
Ty Cronin
published
3.42
Beyza Akcam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.16
Karin Davis
published
Karen Robertson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Fung + Joan Garlow303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Williamson
43W–40L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
4.38
4.5
Jennifer Cullum
22W–32L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Rosanne Murphy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
Virginia Fung
60W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Kimberly Sandhu
274W–138L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Jennifer Exelby
95W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Jessica Walsh
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Joan Garlow
156W–129L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Kate Dempsey
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Ty Cronin
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
4
Beyza Akcam
211W–249L career · 3 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.42
Karin Davis
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.16
Karen Robertson
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.