Teams

LWR Vavrek

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 7.0 W Wednesday

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-13vs Sarasota National BrosnanWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Frazier / Karen Patchell vs Suzanne Brosnan / Elizabeth Guest6-1, 6-3
2024-02-21vs LWN ArringtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Tosti / Karen Patchell vs Tammy Hallam / Melissa Kinney6-4, 6-0
2024-02-14vs University Park GiaimoWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Patchell / Christine Tosti vs Paula Lapierre / Terry Williamson6-1, 6-2
2024-02-07vs LBK Club HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Patchell / Christine Tosti vs Ann Miklas / Kimberley Wilson4-6, 5-7
2024-01-31vs LWR SteffensWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Patchell / Christine Tosti vs Nancy Bartlett / Cindy Davis7-6, 6-1
2024-01-24vs Cedars Island GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Crawford / Karen Patchell vs Joan Hutchings / Lisa Pauley6-2, 6-1
2024-01-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Tosti / Karen Patchell vs Melisa French / Regina McLaughlin4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
published 4.5
3.70
Christine Tosti
published 4
3.56
Karen Patchell
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
Teri MacAulay
published
3.40
Regina Beatty
published 3.5
3.23
Sarah Crawford
published
3.07
Gina Ferlise
published
3.07
Cheryl Burton
published 3
Patricia Winn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Tosti + Karen Patchell5645% games+1.4% vs expected
Regina Beatty + Karen Patchell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.51
4
Christine Tosti
6W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Karen Patchell
87W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Teri MacAulay
78W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Regina Beatty
58W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Sarah Crawford
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Gina Ferlise
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Cheryl Burton
10W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
Patricia Winn
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.