Teams

Red 2/Hayes/IS/4.0M tri

2026 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · MEN 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-19vs Lott Red/FR/tri 4.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Conway / Lee Crowley vs Scott White / Karson Davis6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAaron Hayes / Scott Thomas vs Jason Smith / Grant Adams3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJustin Hall / CW Evans vs Mark Chapman / Matt Torres6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · MEN 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue 1/Evans/SH/tri 4.0M6014414156
2Red 1/Russell/LF/4.0 Tri Men5112620163
3Blue 2/Hale/LF/tri 4.0M4212616169
4Norton/LF/tri 4.0 M4212616172
5Red 2/Hayes/IS/4.0M tri4211717156
6Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 M4210819135
7Cuadra/GR/tri 4.0 M3311718153
8Lott Red/FR/tri 4.0M3381024184
9Lott Blue/FR/tri 4.0M2471125173
10Bayer/LF/tri 4.0M2471126192
11Huntley/PH tri 4.0 M1561228196
12Pandu/LF/tri 4.0M1551328190
13James/LF/tri4.0M0621632195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Brian Conway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Devin Renberg
published 4
3.47
Logan Cherry
published
3.45
Michael Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Lee Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
George Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Josh Hinkle
published
2.96
Aaron Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
CW Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Scott Thomas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Conway + Michael Pearson13656% games+4.6% vs expected
CW Evans + Aaron Hayes19657% games+4.4% vs expected
Josh Hinkle + Aaron Hayes4351% games+1.8% vs expected
George Martinez + Brian Conway15454% games−0.6% vs expected
Lee Crowley + Michael Pearson2344% gamesnot enough data
Brian Conway + Lee Crowley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Conway
127W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Devin Renberg
15W–23L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Logan Cherry
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Michael Pearson
80W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Lee Crowley
73W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
George Martinez
80W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Josh Hinkle
51W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Aaron Hayes
67W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
CW Evans
113W–97L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Scott Thomas
49W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.