Teams

Cuadra/GR/tri 4.0 M

2026 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · MEN 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs Red 1/Russell/LF/4.0 Tri MenLost 12
L#1 DoublesJose Angel Mora Ceballos / Adam Hannaford vs Ethan Thomas / Tyler Bright6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulio Cuadra / Tomas Silicaro vs Jeffrey Owen / Parker Williams6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Edwards / Robert Lovelace vs Stefano Bietto / Thorsten Klein2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-05vs Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 MLost 12
W#1 DoublesGregory Kopervos / Austin Zellner vs Dru Prosser / Cody Coggins6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Martin / Bill Drotar vs Tyler Hancock / Jonathan Bush3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris Presley / Robert Lovelace vs Zack Jennings / Alex Howard6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-20vs Pandu/LF/tri 4.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdam Hannaford / Gregory Kopervos vs Koushik Kannan / Velmurugan Venkatachalam6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJulio Cuadra / David Martin vs Keith Averitt / Corey Wilson7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Lovelace / Chris Presley vs Anand Pandurengan / Arjun Rajakutty6-3, 6-0
2026-07-15vs Lott Red/FR/tri 4.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesJose Angel Mora Ceballos / Austin Zellner vs Karson Davis / Scott White6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTomas Silicaro / Tyler Slaight vs Mark Chapman / Brian Torres6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Edwards / Malak Lopez vs Bryce Torres / Matt Torres6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Huntley/PH tri 4.0 MWon 21
W#1 DoublesGregory Kopervos / Austin Zellner vs Craig Loseke / Jeffrey Jackson6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDavid Martin / Tyler Slaight vs Steven Bradley / Patrick Huntley6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDoyt Duncan / Mark Edwards vs Shawn Grant / Todd Hoffman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · MEN 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue 1/Evans/SH/tri 4.0M6014414156
2Red 1/Russell/LF/4.0 Tri Men5112620163
3Blue 2/Hale/LF/tri 4.0M4212616169
4Norton/LF/tri 4.0 M4212616172
5Red 2/Hayes/IS/4.0M tri4211717156
6Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 M4210819135
7Cuadra/GR/tri 4.0 M3311718153
8Lott Red/FR/tri 4.0M3381024184
9Lott Blue/FR/tri 4.0M2471125173
10Bayer/LF/tri 4.0M2471126192
11Huntley/PH tri 4.0 M1561228196
12Pandu/LF/tri 4.0M1551328190
13James/LF/tri4.0M0621632195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Austin Zellner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Adam Hannaford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Gregory Kopervos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Jose Angel Mora Ceballos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Julio Cuadra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Bill Drotar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Tomas Silicaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Robert Lovelace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Tyler Slaight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Malak Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Chris Presley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Mark Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Doyt Duncan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Fabio Terenzi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julio Cuadra + Austin Zellner5263% games+13.1% vs expected
Adam Hannaford + Bill Drotar6163% games+10.2% vs expected
Bill Drotar + Julio Cuadra18265% games+7.2% vs expected
Adam Hannaford + Julio Cuadra4155% gamesnot enough data
Julio Cuadra + Tomas Silicaro314 matchesnot enough data
Adam Hannaford + Doyt Duncan213 matchesnot enough data
Doyt Duncan + Julio Cuadra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin Zellner
36W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Adam Hannaford
93W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.47
Gregory Kopervos
113W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Jose Angel Mora Ceballos
39W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Julio Cuadra
185W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Bill Drotar
103W–78L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Tomas Silicaro
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Robert Lovelace
56W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Tyler Slaight
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Malak Lopez
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Chris Presley
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Mark Edwards
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Doyt Duncan
24W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Fabio Terenzi
39W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.