Teams

Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 M

2026 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · MEN 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs Huntley/PH tri 4.0 MWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Kossman / Cody Coggins vs Steven Henry / Jeffrey Jackson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRob Stalb / Daniel Wheeler vs Todd Hoffman / David Dodd6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesZack Jennings / Philip Shain vs Curt Carmichael / Bryan Hawkins6-1, 7-5
2026-08-10vs Red 1/Russell/LF/4.0 Tri MenLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Kossman / Brandon Parduhn vs Scott Russell / Matt Holland7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShaun James / Dustin Howerton vs Parker Williams / Sean Burns3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIan Curran / Alex Howard vs Hernan Elizondo / Donell Trinh2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-05vs Cuadra/GR/tri 4.0 MWon 21
L#1 DoublesDru Prosser / Cody Coggins vs Gregory Kopervos / Austin Zellner2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Hancock / Jonathan Bush vs David Martin / Bill Drotar6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesZack Jennings / Alex Howard vs Chris Presley / Robert Lovelace3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Pandu/LF/tri 4.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Kossman / Cody Coggins vs Koushik Kannan / Corey Wilson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBradley Sanditen / Jonathan Bush vs Keith Averitt / Matthew Maddern4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPhilip Shain / Alex Howard vs Dinesh Srinivasan / Anand Pandurengan6-2, 6-0
2026-07-09vs Lott Red/FR/tri 4.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTyler Hancock / Brandon Parduhn vs Garrett Graves / Chris OHara6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Wheeler / Rob Stalb vs Grant Adams / Jason Smith3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIan Curran / Zack Jennings vs Bryce Torres / Matt Torres2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · MEN 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue 1/Evans/SH/tri 4.0M6014414156
2Red 1/Russell/LF/4.0 Tri Men5112620163
3Blue 2/Hale/LF/tri 4.0M4212616169
4Norton/LF/tri 4.0 M4212616172
5Red 2/Hayes/IS/4.0M tri4211717156
6Sanditen/LF/tri 4.0 M4210819135
7Cuadra/GR/tri 4.0 M3311718153
8Lott Red/FR/tri 4.0M3381024184
9Lott Blue/FR/tri 4.0M2471125173
10Bayer/LF/tri 4.0M2471126192
11Huntley/PH tri 4.0 M1561228196
12Pandu/LF/tri 4.0M1551328190
13James/LF/tri4.0M0621632195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Cody Coggins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Brandon Parduhn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Ryan Kossman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Wheeler
published 3.5
3.21
Bradley Sanditen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Zack Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Tyler Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Dru Prosser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Dustin Howerton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Alex Howard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Rob Stalb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Shaun James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Philip Shain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Ian Curran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Bush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Wheeler + Dustin Howerton7556% games+11.2% vs expected
Tyler Hancock + Dru Prosser4153% games+1.7% vs expected
Dustin Howerton + Rob Stalb3639% games−3.6% vs expected
Shaun James + Rob Stalb4254% gamesnot enough data
Bradley Sanditen + Shaun James2354% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Wheeler + Rob Stalb404 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Sanditen + Dustin Howerton033 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Sanditen + Dru Prosser303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cody Coggins
45W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.58
4
Brandon Parduhn
24W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
Ryan Kossman
23W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Daniel Wheeler
17W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Bradley Sanditen
47W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Zack Jennings
28W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Tyler Hancock
30W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Dru Prosser
25W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
Dustin Howerton
42W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Alex Howard
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Rob Stalb
51W–66L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Shaun James
86W–72L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Philip Shain
31W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
Ian Curran
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Jonathan Bush
23W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.