Teams

Lewis 40s/LF

2021 TUL MIXED 40 & Over League · 7.0 MIXED

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-02vs Hollowell/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Steinke / Robert Coffey vs Velmurugan Venkatachalam / Divina Roman5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSteven Anagnost / Stephanie Pugh vs Matthew Prim / Valerie Edgeller6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGinger Ford / Thomas Arens vs Tae Kim / Shawna Arnold-Lowe6-4, 6-3
2021-04-29vs Nichols/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Stitt / Jay Penn vs Shae Hedrick / Ken Hedrick6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLea Anagnost / Steven Anagnost vs Trista Huntley / Ky Nichols6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGinger Ford / Thomas Arens vs Melissa Still / Fontaine Still6-1, 6-2
2021-04-25vs Mullenix/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith Henley / Kristin Calabrese vs Rebekah Herrick / Ed Vestal3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Anagnost / Stephanie Pugh vs Andrea Martin / John Johnson3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesThomas Arens / Ginger Ford vs John Buchan / Gloria Mullenix6-4, 6-3
2021-04-18vs Mitchell/PHWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Stitt / Jay Penn vs Steven Henry / Staci Henry6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Steinke / Keith Henley vs Lisa Mitchell / Robert Mitchell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Pugh / Phil Hoey vs Mitzi Thomas / Jim Vanderveen2-6, 2-6
2021-03-28vs Hollowell/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Stitt / Jay Penn vs Divina Roman / Larry Stalcup6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLea Anagnost / Steven Anagnost vs Lori Hollowell / Timothy O'Brien6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie Pugh / Jason Ford vs Tina Moody / Chris Moody1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-03-21vs RED: Tulloch 40s 7.0/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Arens / Ginger Ford vs Stephanie Loseke / Craig Loseke6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinger Coffey / Robert Coffey vs Jennifer Lang / John Schissel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJason Ford / Amy Stitt vs Shelly Gore / Kevin Gore1-6, 6-7
2021-03-07vs Hartfelder/ISLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith Henley / Kristin Calabrese vs Robin Dodson / John Butts Jr5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSteven Anagnost / Lea Anagnost vs Chris Mitchell / Kristin Mitchell6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephanie Pugh / Phil Hoey vs Janice Fagan / Butch Clifton1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 7.0 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TUL: Wyatt/SH701926112
2RED: Tulloch 40s 7.0/LF7219824214
3Wilburn/RH916215921192
4Hernadi/IS5212923205
5Mullenix/LF54161126228
6Mitchell/PH54151226239
7Nichols/LF43111025185
8Lewis 40s/LF3491226193
9Gilbert/LF2681634225

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Amy Stitt
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.59
Kristin Calabrese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jay Penn
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.36
Robert Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Tiffany Steinke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Keith Henley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Thomas Arens
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.18
Shelley Lewis
published
3.16
Ginger Coffey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Steven Anagnost
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
2.90
Ginger Penn
published 3
Ginger Ford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Lea Anagnost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Pugh
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Penn + Ginger Penn271157% games+12.3% vs expected
Jay Penn + Ginger Coffey5361% games+9.4% vs expected
Lea Anagnost + Steven Anagnost11656% games+4.6% vs expected
Ginger Ford + Thomas Arens51148% games+2.7% vs expected
Robert Coffey + Ginger Coffey6451% games−0.4% vs expected
Shelley Lewis + Steven Anagnost6749% games−1.5% vs expected
Thomas Arens + Tiffany Steinke4746% games−8.3% vs expected
Keith Henley + Tiffany Steinke4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Stitt
113W–98L career · 6 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kristin Calabrese
120W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jay Penn
210W–90L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.50
Robert Coffey
59W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
Tiffany Steinke
126W–93L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Keith Henley
63W–71L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Thomas Arens
91W–134L career · 9 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Shelley Lewis
89W–52L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ginger Coffey
113W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.16
Steven Anagnost
89W–86L career · 11 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Ginger Penn
138W–113L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Ginger Ford
71W–80L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lea Anagnost
64W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Pugh
44W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.