Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.55 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule5 played

2023-05-23Lost 0–1

L#3 DoublesLezlae Grubb / Tracee Kemp vs Jennifer Stringham / Michelle Fowkes1-6, 0-6

2023-05-16Lost 0–1

L#2 DoublesLezlae Grubb / Tracee Kemp vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Lindsey Williams2-6, 4-6

2023-04-25Lost 0–1

L#2 DoublesTerri Brunner / Kelly Yuen vs Julie Hall / Dalynn Thomas0-6, 0-6

2023-04-18vs Park City MARC-Smith/ThomasLost 0–1

L#3 DoublesNancy Sparrer / Kelly Yuen vs Kiki Frazier / Mary Bourke5-7, 3-6

2023-04-11Won 1–0

W#2 DoublesTerri Brunner / Kelly Yuen vs Sharon Larkin / Kaye Moulding6-4, 6-3

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72

Mithona Nielsen

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4

3.33

Haley H Moreno

usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5

3.25

Heather Sliwa

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.23

Jennie Stacey

usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5

3.17

Ann Trentman

usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published 3.5

3.14

Kathi Poggi

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.13

Terri Brunner

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.06

Shelly Kemp

usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published —

3.00

Allison Leishman

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

2.93

Katie Winson

usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5

2.89

Kadee Wolfgram

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5

2.88

Nancy Sparrer

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5

—

Kelly Yuen

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Lezlae Grubb

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Tracee Kemp

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Valeriya Vasenina

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathi Poggi + Shelly Kemp	2–3	48% games	+9.4% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Heather Sliwa	7–0	63% games	+7.6% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Allison Leishman	4–5	51% games	+6.7% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner	9–8	52% games	+4.6% vs expected
Terri Brunner + Heather Sliwa	23–12	53% games	+3.9% vs expected
Mithona Nielsen + Kadee Wolfgram	5–7	45% games	+3.6% vs expected
Terri Brunner + Kelly Yuen	8–5	53% games	+3.0% vs expected
Kathi Poggi + Jennie Stacey	3–3	54% games	+2.0% vs expected

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mithona Nielsen

113W–116L career · 6 lines in 2023

5%94%1%

3.72

3.5

Haley H Moreno

82W–46L career · 9 lines in 2023

1%90%9%

3.33

3.5

Heather Sliwa

82W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023

3%95%3%

3.25

3.5

Jennie Stacey

153W–129L career · 12 lines in 2023

4%94%2%

3.23

3.5

Ann Trentman

186W–245L career · 17 lines in 2023

10%89%1%

3.17

3.5

Kathi Poggi

56W–42L career · 7 lines in 2023

14%86%<1%

3.14

3.5

Terri Brunner

142W–142L career · 7 lines in 2023

17%83%<1%

3.13

—

Shelly Kemp

141W–135L career · 11 lines in 2023

31%69%<1%

3.06

3.5

Allison Leishman

132W–210L career · 14 lines in 2023

51%49%<1%

3.00

3.5

Katie Winson

128W–124L career · 6 lines in 2023

70%30%<1%

2.93

3.5

Kadee Wolfgram

97W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023

80%20%<1%

2.89

3.5

Nancy Sparrer

28W–101L career · type A · 8 lines in 2023

81%19%<1%

2.88

—

Kelly Yuen

18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023

not enough data

—

Lezlae Grubb

39W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023

not enough data

—

Tracee Kemp

39W–100L career · 6 lines in 2023

not enough data

—

Valeriya Vasenina

14W–16L career · 8 lines in 2023

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.