Teams

Hughes - Dbls 3.5W

2022 Piedmont Summer Daze Doubles · Summer Daze 3.5 Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs Billings - Dbls 3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatty Dutton / Robyn Manning vs Emily Wilson / Vicki Amendum6-7, 1-6
2022-07-14vs Goy/Georgevich - Dbls 3.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Baker / Kimberly Gay vs Judiann Georgevich / Gina Goy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarian Hogan / Tammie Hughes vs Kathy Chinnis / Sara Millard6-4, 7-6
2022-06-30vs Roley - Dbls 3.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Marsha Tice vs Andrea Pollina / Lori Harrington6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTammie Hughes / Robyn Manning vs Shannon Roley / Meghan Hilleboe6-4, 6-4
2022-06-28vs Miller - Dbls 3.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatty Dutton / Robyn Manning vs Rebekah East / Meredith Heberle6-2, 6-4
2022-06-09vs Yates - Dbls 3.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Tammie Hughes vs Laura Ambler / Allison Walsh6-2, 6-2
2022-06-07vs Dulin - Dbls 3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Lisa Baker vs Amy Dulin / Michele Shigo1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-26vs Billings - Dbls 3.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Patty Dutton vs Annetta Bartle / Vicki Amendum6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobyn Manning / Margaret Joseph vs Emily Wilson / Reeves Rhoten7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Daze 3.5 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Marian Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Carolyn Pellerin
published 4
3.57
Kimberly Gay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Marsha Tice
published
3.35
Tammie Hughes
published
3.31
Margaret Joseph
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.26
Trisha Kirby
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.21
Robyn Manning
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Theresa Atchison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Manning + Margaret Joseph5259% games+4.6% vs expected
Kimberly Gay + Marian Hogan8063% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Gay + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Kimberly Gay
376W–167L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Tammie Hughes
23W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Margaret Joseph
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Patty Dutton
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Robyn Manning
139W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Theresa Atchison
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.