Teams

Marco YMCA /DiGeronimo

2025 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-13vs GreyOaks / ArchieLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Slifkin / Jennifer Ball vs Janet Seidl / Peggy Hogan2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLouise Decker / Linda Keely vs Nancy Harbert / Maureen Dougherty1-6, 1-6
2025-05-07vs Sterling Oaks / AldermanWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ball / Linda Koole vs Deanna Fowler / Amy McHale6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Irvin Hawes / Barbara Slifkin vs Nackey Piedrahita / Jill Sanders6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Linda Keely vs Lynda Guba / Kelly Beam6-3, 6-1
2025-05-05vs Players Club / WautersWon 20
W#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Lisa LaSpina Bonevento vs Crystie Ciriello / Lisa Sackett6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Jan Jackman vs Sheila Smith / Lisa Renaud6-3, 6-2
2025-04-28vs Pelican Bay North / BrooksLost 02
L#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Maureen Nowak vs Susan Labriola / Amy Enxing6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLori Irvin Hawes / Dorothea Farmer vs Greta Beatty / Risa Martinelli1-6, 6-7
2025-04-21vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 21
W#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Tonja Brewer vs Diana Pleeter / Brenda Rhoda6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Keely / Donna Digeronimo vs Bethe Halpern / Sunny Barger1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLori Irvin Hawes / Linda Koole vs Julie Lenhart / Susie Beaudet6-3, 6-3
2025-04-07vs Olde Cypress / NavarroWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Barbara Slifkin vs Angela Aline / Beth Rainey6-1, 6-2
2025-03-31vs Cambier / TrombleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa LaSpina Bonevento / Donna Digeronimo vs Lisa Vivori / Maureen Sexson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Dorothea Farmer vs Margaret Finn / Linda Stovall6-3, 6-3
2025-03-24vs Island Country Club - HeinauerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNada Uzelac / Donna Digeronimo vs Karen Crines / Renee Facciola7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLouise Decker / Dana Sacks vs Ricki Giersch / Julie Kastholm6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Tonja Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Lori Irvin Hawes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Donna Digeronimo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Marianne Khayat
published
3.54
Dana Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Kathleen Griffin
published 3.5
3.29
Linda Koole
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Jan Kolesar
published
3.28
3.26
Nada Uzelac
published
3.24
Marianne Gaffney
published
3.19
Linda Keely
published
3.17
Jan Jackman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Barbara Slifkin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Dorothea Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Ball
published
Louise Decker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maureen Nowak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Digeronimo + Dana Sacks8554% games+1.1% vs expected
Kathleen Griffin + Linda Koole12753% games−4.5% vs expected
Louise Decker + Linda Koole6454% gamesnot enough data
Linda Keely + Maureen Nowak4356% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Griffin + Louise Decker4167% gamesnot enough data
Dorothea Farmer + Marianne Gaffney3254% gamesnot enough data
Lori Irvin Hawes + Jennifer Ball404 matchesnot enough data
Dorothea Farmer + Jan Jackman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lori Irvin Hawes
128W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Donna Digeronimo
107W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Marianne Khayat
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Kathleen Griffin
44W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Linda Koole
123W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Jan Kolesar
140W–68L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Lisa LaSpina Bonevento
13W–36L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Nada Uzelac
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Marianne Gaffney
19W–27L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Slifkin
35W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Dorothea Farmer
99W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Ball
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Louise Decker
47W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Nowak
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.