Teams

Heritage Bay - Beaudet

2025 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.81 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-16vs Sterling Oaks / AldermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesSunny Barger / Diana Pleeter vs Barbara Beard / Tina Doria6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrenda Rhoda / Karen Hole vs Kelly Beam / Jill Sanders6-3, 6-3
2025-05-09vs Marco YMCA - CorreaLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrenda Rhoda / Karen Hole vs Ana Cecilia Isaza / Tanya Smith4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Davey / Lauren Keillor vs Sarah Griffin / Kelly Lord0-6, 3-6
2025-04-28vs GreyOaks / ArchieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrenda Rhoda / Marie Shoaf vs Monica Callaghan / Janet Seidl5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Kimberly Davey vs Robin Engelson / Debra Logue3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-21vs Marco YMCA /DiGeronimoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Brenda Rhoda vs Louise Decker / Tonja Brewer4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBethe Halpern / Sunny Barger vs Linda Keely / Donna Digeronimo6-1, 6-4
2025-04-14vs Marco YMCA / WashakLost 12
L#1 DoublesBethe Halpern / Natalie Cortese vs Susanna Haedelt / Tricia McBride4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Shoaf / Sunny Barger vs Connie Johnson / Andrea Washak4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKimberly Davey / Mary Huber-Olk vs Ann Garvey / Paula Turkiewicz6-4, 7-6
2025-04-07vs Naples YMCA / JohnsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Lenhart / Natalie Cortese vs Sara Garrett / Kelly Fallon3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Sunny Barger vs Tanja Satzinger / Christine Turk3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Hole / Mary Huber-Olk vs Kelly Heintzelman / Patricia MacDonald7-5, 6-3
2025-03-31vs Pelican Bay North / BrooksWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Brenda Rhoda vs Beverly Biltz / Dawn Cyr6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Shoaf / Natalie Cortese vs Marie France McCloskey / Sharon Bartle6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Lenhart / Sharon Sturges vs Anastasia Brooks / Lisa Silva6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-24vs Pelican Bay North / HowardLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Sharon Sturges vs Beth Jones / Denna Saidnawey6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Davey / Cheryl Ingram vs Tamara Durante / Tami Turner2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bethe Halpern
published 4
3.74
Diana Pleeter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kimberly Davey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Carla Klumpp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Sharon Sturges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Sunny Barger
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Marie Shoaf
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.61
Karen Hole
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.50
Julie Lenhart
published
3.47
Brenda Rhoda
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.42
Cheryl Ingram
published 3.5
3.37
Susie Beaudet
published
3.33
Mary Varilek
published
3.33
Lauren Keillor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Rhoda + Sunny Barger495049% games+3.5% vs expected
Diana Pleeter + Marie Shoaf221453% games−0.2% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Cheryl Ingram4355% games−0.4% vs expected
Carla Klumpp + Sunny Barger131547% games−4.4% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Lauren Keillor101149% games−5.1% vs expected
Diana Pleeter + Lauren Keillor191450% games−6.4% vs expected
Sunny Barger + Marie Shoaf111349% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Rhoda + Karen Hole6753% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bethe Halpern
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Diana Pleeter
139W–84L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Kimberly Davey
129W–159L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carla Klumpp
99W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Sharon Sturges
85W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Sunny Barger
206W–211L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Marie Shoaf
160W–135L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Karen Hole
99W–147L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Julie Lenhart
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Brenda Rhoda
141W–148L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Cheryl Ingram
107W–67L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mary Varilek
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Lauren Keillor
161W–184L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jacqui ONeal Privitere
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.