Teams

Sterling Oaks / Alderman

2025 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-08vs Pelican Bay North / HowardLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Wedge / Elizabeth Coates vs Tami Turner / Patricia Miles5-7, 6-7
2025-04-21vs Olde Cypress / NavarroLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Wedge / Amy McHale vs Beth Rainey / Michelle Maggal4-6, 4-6
2025-04-14vs Naples YMCA / JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Wedge / Elizabeth Coates vs Christine Turk / Diana Heckert6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-07vs Pelican Bay North / BrooksLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Wedge / Cindy Simonovich vs Anastasia Brooks / Susan Labriola4-6, 4-6
2025-03-31vs GreyOaks / ArchieLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Wedge / Deanna Fowler vs Jennifer Archie / Nancy Harbert6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-24vs COLLIER/Shields/Combo50&over7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Wedge / Jennifer Heimmel vs Minde Shinnick / Brenda Shields0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Leigh Buchanan
published
3.79
Sharon Wedge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Barbara Beard
published 4
3.35
Jill Sanders
published
3.33
Nackey Piedrahita
published
3.31
Deanna Fowler
published 3.5
3.24
Stacy Ludwig
published
3.22
Amy McHale
published 3.5
3.04
Cindy Simonovich
published 3.5
Elizabeth Coates
published
Jennifer Heimmel
published
Kelly Beam
published
Leslie Muzzio
published
Lynda Guba
published
Tina Doria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Coates + Deanna Fowler2347% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Coates + Tina Doria224 matchesnot enough data
Lynda Guba + Deanna Fowler123 matchesnot enough data
Tina Doria + Amy McHale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Buchanan
15W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Sharon Wedge
112W–90L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Barbara Beard
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jill Sanders
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Nackey Piedrahita
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Deanna Fowler
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Stacy Ludwig
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amy McHale
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cindy Simonovich
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Donna Pellegrini Alderman
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Coates
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Heimmel
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Beam
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Muzzio
53W–51L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynda Guba
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Doria
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.