Teams

NITA S 65CWDf Score (Michl)

2023 NITA3 Summerz Combo Daytime League · NITA Summerz 6.5 Combo Women Daytime

18 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesKaren Hayes / Lara Taylor vs Jaymie McGrath / Kathy Robinson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPam Byerly / Nancy Dugan vs Amy Newlan / Tammy Scott5-7, 1-6
2023-08-11vs NITA S 65CWDb NW Huntley (Korte)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Akers / Lynn Schwaab vs Teresa Hunter / Donna Murtaugh6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Hayes / Kimberly Michl vs Cameron Stoelting / Christine Pizza1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Kelly / Karen Leenheers vs Danielle Barnvos / Rebecca List5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLynn Schwaab / Michele Warren vs Grace Kuhrt / Laura White3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Leenheers / Susan Buonavolanto vs Jill Lovelace / Joanna Ahearn1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Sher / Tara Borre vs Julie Burke-Concannon / Krysten Thomas4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesBecky Lemna / Lynn Schwaab vs Erika Baka / Laura Dimech7-5, 3-2
L#2 DoublesCarol Yeo / Kimberly Michl vs Suzi Feliciano / Lori Vardas0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPam Byerly / Mary Jo Quirk vs Jyl Bonomo / Jenna Harris6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCarol Yeo / Tara Borre vs Cindy Monahan / Laura Dimech6-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesCourtney Shishman / Nancy Dugan vs Lori Toney / Nancy Valerio1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Buonavolanto / Karen Hayes vs Sylvie Rossi / Kelley OBrien2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJulie Akers / Lara Taylor vs Francine Holmes / Anne Rockwell1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPam Byerly / Karen Leenheers vs Stephanie Remelius / Valerie Cook1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Sher / Nancy Dugan vs Tracy Ries / Julie Savanelli1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLynn Schwaab / Carol Yeo vs Toni Mountcastle / Julie Roth5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Leenheers / Susan Buonavolanto vs Sharon Kerr-Zygmunt / Julie Savanelli3-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesMichele Warren / Tara Borre vs Francine Holmes / Andrea Zuckerman0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJulie Akers / Lara Taylor vs Jaymie McGrath / Kathy Robinson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTara Borre / Mary Jo Quirk vs Melissa Starkey / Gwen Tegart3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Kerrigan / Karen Leenheers vs Nancy Yanney / Tammy Scott3-6, 6-7
2023-05-24vs NITA S 65CWDb NW Huntley (Korte)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Lemna / Lynn Schwaab vs Christine Pizza / Teresa Hunter3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLara Taylor / Julie Akers vs Valerie Gomogda / Susan Luebchow7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Sher / Tara Borre vs Amy Bradford / Maida Korte2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBecky Lemna / Nancy Dugan vs Laura White / ANDREA TAHLIER0-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Hayes / Lara Taylor vs Erin Goodwin / Holly Wanless6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Sher / Cathleen Kelly vs Jen Beringer / Joanna Ahearn6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Summerz 6.5 Combo Women Daytime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 65CWDe Butterfield Park (Barsotti/McNamara)9124621216
2NITA S 65CWDa Wheaton (Johnson/Kapetaneas)64191128228
3NITA S 65CWDc Chicago Highlands (White/Bucolo)64181229251
4NITA S 65CWDd Five Star (Delgrosso)46131739261
5NITA S 65CWDf Score (Michl)3772347324
6NITA S 65CWDb NW Huntley (Korte)2892142268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Julie Akers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Pam Byerly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Becky Lemna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carol Yeo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cathleen Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Courtney Shishman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Lynn Schwaab
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Lara Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.96
Kimberly Michl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Tara Borre
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.92
Nancy Dugan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Susan Buonavolanto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Diana Kerrigan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Leenheers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lisa Sher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Jo Quirk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Warren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Taylor + Carol Yeo7553% games+8.6% vs expected
Julie Akers + Courtney Shishman7257% games+8.0% vs expected
Lara Taylor + Tara Borre2352% games+4.0% vs expected
Lynn Schwaab + Lara Taylor3442% games+1.6% vs expected
Kimberly Michl + Carol Yeo5348% games−0.3% vs expected
Lynn Schwaab + Becky Lemna11453% games−2.3% vs expected
Lara Taylor + Karen Hayes7650% games−4.6% vs expected
Nancy Dugan + Lara Taylor3445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Akers
29W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Pam Byerly
34W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Becky Lemna
129W–114L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carol Yeo
41W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cathleen Kelly
23W–14L career · type M · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Courtney Shishman
27W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Lynn Schwaab
61W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
Lara Taylor
61W–94L career · 5 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.00
Kimberly Michl
19W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Tara Borre
61W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
Nancy Dugan
24W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Susan Buonavolanto
13W–21L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Diana Kerrigan
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Karen Hayes
29W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Leenheers
27W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Sher
28W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Jo Quirk
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Warren
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.