Teams

FCCC GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-24vs TAGWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristie Steinbock / Pam Raab vs Cheryl Clausen / Melissa Dalton7-6, 6-0
2021-05-17vs MLF FUCHSIALost 01
L#1 DoublesShanti Green / Jane Schmelzle vs Leticia Dunn / Carol Murphy1-6, 3-6
2021-05-10vs HMTC TURQUOISESplit 11
L#1 SinglesJane Schmelzle vs Danielle Hahn6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPam Raab / Kristie Steinbock vs Sharon Terry / Kelly Strnad7-5, 6-4
2021-05-06vs HMTC TURQUOISEWon 20
W#1 DoublesShanti Green / Jane Schmelzle vs Kelley Knudson / Kelly Strnad6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristie Steinbock / Pam Raab vs Sharon Terry / Mary Gabiola6-3, 2-1
2021-04-26vs MLF FUCHSIASplit 11
L#2 DoublesSherry McCoy / Kristie Steinbock vs Erin Dirvonas / Brittney Stephenson3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJane Schmelzle vs Katheryn Hill4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jane Schmelzle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Hilary McCart
published 3.5
2.77
Kristie Steinbock
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Catherine Orr
published 3
2.58
Sherry McCoy
published
2.58
Shanti Green
published
Jackie Spradley
published
Laurie Hittesdorf
published
Maureen Bee
published
Nancy Hartley
published
Pam Raab
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry McCoy + Jackie Spradley3250% games+4.0% vs expected
Shanti Green + Jane Schmelzle4163% gamesnot enough data
Shanti Green + Sherry McCoy213 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Steinbock + Jane Schmelzle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jane Schmelzle
68W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Hilary McCart
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Kristie Steinbock
19W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Catherine Orr
9W–20L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Sherry McCoy
20W–24L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
Shanti Green
38W–27L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
Jackie Spradley
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurie Hittesdorf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen Bee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Hartley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pam Raab
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.