Teams

TAG

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-24vs FCCC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesThora Pabst / Mary Bengford vs Shanti Green / Hilary McCart6-7, 3-6
2021-05-17vs HMTC TURQUOISEWon 10
W#2 DoublesThora Pabst / Amy Herold vs Jo Thomson / Lisa Bott3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-10vs MLF FUCHSIAWon 10
W#1 DoublesThora Pabst / Beth Smits vs Liz Cundall / Satie Walker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesBeth Smits vs Sherry McCoy4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-26vs HMTC TURQUOISEWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Gattis / Thora Pabst vs Kelley Knudson / Lisa Bott6-1, 6-1
2021-04-24vs MLF FUCHSIALost 01
L#2 DoublesThora Pabst / Beth Smits vs Kristen Frisch / Erin Dirvonas6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Shirley Moore
published
2.66
Beth Smits
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.66
Amy Herold
published 3
2.65
Dawn Setser
published 3
2.52
Sandy Chenore
published
2.47
Carolyn Gattis
published 3
2.45
Thora Pabst
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.39
Gail Sullivan
published 3
2.10
Cheryl Clausen
published 2.5
Mary Bengford
published
Melissa Dalton
published
Shelly Donahue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Sullivan + Shelly Donahue2737% games+7.5% vs expected
Melissa Dalton + Amy Herold4445% games+1.6% vs expected
Sandy Chenore + Amy Herold8744% games−2.4% vs expected
Melissa Dalton + Sandy Chenore0735% games−3.3% vs expected
Thora Pabst + Amy Herold1932% games−9.8% vs expected
Gail Sullivan + Cheryl Clausen0625% gamesnot enough data
Gail Sullivan + Carolyn Gattis0626% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Dalton + Cheryl Clausen044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirley Moore
53W–67L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Beth Smits
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Amy Herold
19W–36L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Dawn Setser
16W–22L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
2.65
Sandy Chenore
17W–31L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Carolyn Gattis
5W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Thora Pabst
30W–85L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.45
3
Gail Sullivan
3W–46L career · type A · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
2.39
2.5
Cheryl Clausen
0W–33L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Mary Bengford
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Melissa Dalton
7W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelly Donahue
11W–26L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.