Teams

HMTC TURQUOISE

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-24vs MLF FUCHSIASplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Gabiola / Jackie Smith vs Satie Walker / Liz Cundall6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlli Lackey vs Andrea Flake1-6, 1-6
2021-05-17vs TAGSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Comer-Ross / Mary Gabiola vs Shirley Moore / Carolyn Gattis3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSharon Terry / Kelley Knudson vs Melissa Dalton / Cheryl Clausen7-5, 7-5
2021-05-06vs FCCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelley Knudson / Kelly Strnad vs Shanti Green / Jane Schmelzle1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Terry / Mary Gabiola vs Kristie Steinbock / Pam Raab3-6, 1-2
2021-05-03vs MLF FUCHSIALost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Comer-Ross / Mary Gabiola vs Alison Earnhart / Kristen Frisch3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAlli Lackey vs Andrea Flake0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelley Knudson / Kelly Strnad vs Liz Cundall / Kimberley Pascavis1-6, 0-6
2021-04-26vs TAGLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Gabiola / Kim Comer-Ross vs Shirley Moore / Gail Sullivan7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlli Lackey vs Dawn Setser4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelley Knudson / Lisa Bott vs Carolyn Gattis / Thora Pabst1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Alli Lackey
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Jackie Smith
published 3
2.69
Mary Gabiola
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.40
Kelley Knudson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.31
Glenna Cook
published 2.5
Jo Thomson
published
Sharon Terry
published
Stephanie Courts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Knudson + Mary Gabiola10452% games−8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alli Lackey
74W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
3.49
3
Jackie Smith
26W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Mary Gabiola
61W–86L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Kelley Knudson
34W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.40
2.5
Glenna Cook
3W–32L career · no lines in 2021
0%93%7%
2.31
Jo Thomson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sharon Terry
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Courts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.