Teams

LTA RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs MEA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Benson / John Schroeder vs Nick Talocco / Christopher Barreca6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Creek / Roy Parker vs Brian Westnedge / David Belin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFred Todd / Timothy Rakow vs John Blanco / Andrew Roppel2-6, 3-6
2022-07-13vs CVTA REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMark Creek / William Benson vs Bill Cowern / Thomas Lastick6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesTimothy Rakow vs Steve Harford4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Payne / John Schroeder vs Lance Olson / Sean Kracklauer6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRoy Parker / Mike Yoder vs Andrew Meseck / Dave Hwang7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-06vs TTA GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesTodd Isaacson / William Benson vs Michael Fullerton / Randy Bell7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTimothy Rakow vs Steven Allscheid6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMike Yoder / Larry Parkhurst vs Kevin Darby / Michael Ely0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFred Todd / Dan Raykovitz vs Christopher Ayala / Joey Garcia0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-29vs NJ GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesWilliam Benson / Todd Isaacson vs Brian Messer / Lee Wilkerson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTimothy Rakow vs Jim Todd7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLarry Parkhurst / Mike Yoder vs Greg Olson / Michael Everard6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesFred Todd / Mark Creek vs Dan Bottinelli / Mike Stewart6-4, 7-5
2022-06-22vs BRMST GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesTodd Isaacson / William Benson vs Mike Dery / David Ipsen6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMark Creek vs Brad Thurman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Payne / Larry Parkhurst vs Thomas Rogers / Dwayne CARDOSA6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-15vs BTA REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesJohn Schroeder / William Benson vs Scott MacBride / David Corujo7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRoy Parker vs Johannes Steenekamp0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Payne / Mark Creek vs Marc Dolezal / John Nevins2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFred Todd / Larry Parkhurst vs Parker Dodd / John Viloria1-6, 0-6
2022-06-08vs RMTC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesWilliam Benson / John Schroeder vs Niels Damrauer / Daniel Angst6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTimothy Rakow vs Andrew Niemeyer6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDan Raykovitz / Steven Payne vs Richard Bagley / Patrick Edwards2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRoy Parker / Larry Parkhurst vs Jim Latsko / Glen Sieroslawski2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Mark Creek
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
John Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Todd Isaacson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Timothy Rakow
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Peter Champe
published 3.5
3.06
Roy Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.96
Dan Raykovitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Fred Todd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Larry Parkhurst
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Mike Yoder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Payne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Benson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Schroeder + William Benson7259% games+0.3% vs expected
Fred Todd + Roy Parker11229% games−8.5% vs expected
John Schroeder + Todd Isaacson7258% gamesnot enough data
Fred Todd + Timothy Rakow4157% gamesnot enough data
Steven Payne + John Schroeder404 matchesnot enough data
Larry Parkhurst + Roy Parker044 matchesnot enough data
Larry Parkhurst + Mike Yoder224 matchesnot enough data
Todd Isaacson + William Benson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mark Creek
92W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
John Schroeder
51W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Todd Isaacson
45W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Timothy Rakow
28W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Peter Champe
33W–40L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Roy Parker
37W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Dan Raykovitz
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Fred Todd
19W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Larry Parkhurst
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Yoder
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Payne
24W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Benson
55W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.