Teams

NJ GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-22vs BRMST GOLDLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatthew Studzinski / Nathaniel Strout vs Brad Thurman / Thomas Rogers4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJim Todd vs Scott Sutton3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Messer / Michael Everard vs David Ipsen / Ken Claussen3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Santmyer / Michael Campbell vs Philip Cangilla / Dwayne CARDOSA6-1, 6-2
2022-07-20vs CVTA REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesLee Wilkerson / William Santmyer vs Bill Cowern / Thomas Lastick4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBernie Smith vs Steve Harford2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDan Bottinelli / Greg Olson vs Thomas Booth / Lance Olson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNathaniel Strout / Mike Stewart vs Daniel Flynn / Andrew Meseck7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-13vs TTA GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatthew Studzinski / Nathaniel Strout vs Michael Fullerton / Randy Bell7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBernie Smith vs Kevin Darby1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Everard / William Santmyer vs Michael Ely / Nile Knez6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMichael Campbell / Mike Stewart vs Brett Herbert / Christopher Ayala4-6, 2-6
2022-06-29vs LTA REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Messer / Lee Wilkerson vs William Benson / Todd Isaacson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJim Todd vs Timothy Rakow5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Olson / Michael Everard vs Larry Parkhurst / Mike Yoder3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDan Bottinelli / Mike Stewart vs Fred Todd / Mark Creek4-6, 5-7
2022-06-22vs BTA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Stewart / Matthew Studzinski vs Patrick Callard / Michael Davidoff1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGreg Olson vs Scott MacBride0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Messer / Lee Wilkerson vs Charles Hoffman / John Viloria7-6, 6-4
2022-06-15vs RMTC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Studzinski / Bernie Smith vs Cecil MacGregor / Glen Sieroslawski6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJim Todd vs John Koval6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Everard / Brian Messer vs Richard Bagley / Jim Latsko4-6, 1-6
2022-06-08vs MEA GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesNathaniel Strout / Matthew Studzinski vs Adam Boyd / Nick Talocco3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJim Todd vs Tony Ross1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Santmyer / Greg Olson vs John Blanco / Danny Wages6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLee Wilkerson / Michael Campbell vs Jim Irwin / Andrew Roppel1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Nathaniel Strout
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Brian Messer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Dan Bottinelli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Greg Olson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Bernie Smith
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Todd
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lee Wilkerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Matthew Studzinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Everard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
William Santmyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathaniel Strout + Matthew Studzinski151153% games−0.5% vs expected
Dan Bottinelli + Mike Stewart3643% games−4.6% vs expected
Brian Messer + Michael Everard2344% games−4.6% vs expected
Nathaniel Strout + Greg Olson1532% games−5.8% vs expected
Nathaniel Strout + William Santmyer2446% gamesnot enough data
Greg Olson + William Santmyer1446% gamesnot enough data
William Santmyer + Michael Everard224 matchesnot enough data
Dan Bottinelli + Greg Olson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nathaniel Strout
43W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brian Messer
40W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Dan Bottinelli
43W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Greg Olson
15W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Bernie Smith
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Todd
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lee Wilkerson
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Studzinski
26W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Everard
37W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Stewart
13W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Santmyer
24W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.