Teams

CVTA RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs NJ GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesBill Cowern / Thomas Lastick vs Lee Wilkerson / William Santmyer6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSteve Harford vs Bernie Smith6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Booth / Lance Olson vs Dan Bottinelli / Greg Olson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaniel Flynn / Andrew Meseck vs Nathaniel Strout / Mike Stewart6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-13vs LTA REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBill Cowern / Thomas Lastick vs Mark Creek / William Benson3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesSteve Harford vs Timothy Rakow6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLance Olson / Sean Kracklauer vs Steven Payne / John Schroeder3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAndrew Meseck / Dave Hwang vs Roy Parker / Mike Yoder7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-05vs BTA REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesThomas Lastick / Bill Cowern vs Johannes Steenekamp / Michael Davidoff7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSteve Harford vs Scott MacBride6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Booth / Luke Trautwein vs Patrick Callard / John Nevins4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLance Olson / Sean Kracklauer vs John Viloria / Miroslaw Ostaszewski6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-29vs RMTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesBill Cowern / Thomas Lastick vs Cecil MacGregor / Daniel Angst6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSteve Harford vs John Koval6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLuke Trautwein / Ben Bernstein vs Patrick Edwards / Niels Damrauer6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSean Kracklauer / Robert Harberg vs Glen Sieroslawski / Jim Latsko6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-22vs MEA GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesThomas Lastick / Bill Cowern vs Drew Engelmann / Andrew Roppel6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSteve Harford vs Tony Ross7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBen Bernstein / Thomas Booth vs Michael McDowell / Brian Westnedge6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSean Kracklauer / Lance Olson vs Ryan Chreist / Christopher Barreca6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-15vs BRMST GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesThomas Booth / Luke Trautwein vs JoJo Brotamonte / Brad Thurman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSteve Harford vs Scott Sutton6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Flynn / Thomas Lastick vs Stephane Billat / Mike Dery4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTodd Neely / Robert Harberg vs Philip Cangilla / Thomas Rogers6-1, 5-6
2022-06-08vs TTA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesThomas Booth / Thomas Lastick vs Kevin Darby / Randy Bell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSteve Harford vs Joey Garcia6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBill Cowern / Luke Trautwein vs Steven Allscheid / Nile Knez7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBen Bernstein / Dave Hwang vs Michael Ely / Brett Herbert6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Steve Harford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Luke Trautwein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Thomas Lastick
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.31
Dave Hwang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Thomas Booth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Andrew Meseck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bill Cowern
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.08
Lance Olson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Robert Harberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Sean Kracklauer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ben Bernstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Todd Neely
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lance Olson + Thomas Booth2449% games+9.2% vs expected
Bill Cowern + Thomas Lastick5357% games+5.2% vs expected
Lance Olson + Sean Kracklauer1543% games−4.0% vs expected
Bill Cowern + Thomas Booth2437% games−12.7% vs expected
Luke Trautwein + Thomas Booth314 matchesnot enough data
Luke Trautwein + Lance Olson303 matchesnot enough data
Dave Hwang + Ben Bernstein123 matchesnot enough data
Dave Hwang + Robert Harberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Steve Harford
35W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Luke Trautwein
46W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Thomas Lastick
58W–68L career · 7 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.48
3.5
Dave Hwang
30W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Thomas Booth
33W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Andrew Meseck
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bill Cowern
35W–34L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lance Olson
23W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Robert Harberg
19W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Sean Kracklauer
27W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Ben Bernstein
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Neely
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.