Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Picou/Heikkila

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W AM

20 players · average NTRP 4.35 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Kristi Roggensack vs Joanna Heiden / Emily King6-1, 6-4
2023-05-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Tonin / Heather Foy vs Rochelle Obrien / Victoria Lara1-6, 6-7
2023-04-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRenee Utgaard / Kristi Roggensack vs Elizabeth Vigil / Laura Owen3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park -Miller/Woodbury62251538346
2Liberty Park Tennis-Picou/Heikkila62221844365
3Ivory Ridge-Hyde/Langston44182248372
4Liberty Park-Kemp/Wallace17122859399

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Stephanie Tonin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Christina Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.23
Arashan Heikkila
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.22
Christina Eischeid
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.20
Kimberly Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.19
Laura Savage
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
4.10
Susan Picou
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.07
Kara Sargent
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 44% · published 4.5
4.04
Heather Foy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Tracey Valentine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.96
Heidi Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.90
Catherine Bliss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Kristi Roggensack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Olivia Hu
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
3.66
Renee Utgaard
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jackie Grant
published
Jill Jensen Clark
published
LIZ CARLSON
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Lisa Garland
published
Megan Rytting
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Simpson + Christina Eischeid11263% games+14.9% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Tracey Valentine9074% games+13.5% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Kimberly Simpson18959% games+10.7% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Megan Rytting5158% games+9.0% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Tracey Valentine10359% games+8.5% vs expected
Kimberly Simpson + Susan Picou8263% games+7.9% vs expected
Stephanie Tonin + Laura Savage5163% games+7.8% vs expected
Tracey Valentine + Heidi Gordon3252% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephanie Tonin
159W–95L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Christina Mooney
56W–43L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Arashan Heikkila
188W–76L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Christina Eischeid
124W–56L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Kimberly Simpson
136W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
4.20
Laura Savage
105W–60L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
4.19
4.5
Susan Picou
178W–77L career · 11 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Kara Sargent
56W–33L career · 9 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
4.5
Heather Foy
59W–82L career · 1 line in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.04
Tracey Valentine
95W–60L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Heidi Gordon
98W–95L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Catherine Bliss
239W–169L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Kristi Roggensack
126W–91L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Renee Utgaard
156W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Jackie Grant
22W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Jensen Clark
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
LIZ CARLSON
41W–45L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Garland
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Rytting
98W–28L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.