Teams

Love Em and Leave Em Again

2023 40&Over Women · 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.19 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs NJ: StrandLost 12
L#1 SinglesKristy Gilbert vs Melissa McCarthy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanielle Cawood / Senta Cassell vs Maria Vitale / Kimberly Derr3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarole Allers / Edina Jung vs Trisha McNally / Karen Li6-1, 6-4
2023-07-13vs NJ: StrandSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWendy Boiardi / Edina Jung vs Trisha McNally / Karen Li6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKristy Gilbert vs Melissa McCarthy6-1, 6-4
2023-07-06vs NJ: StrandLost 01
L#2 DoublesMegumi Smillie / Laura Gawley vs Maria Vitale / Daniela Dumitru-Buna3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-27vs NJ: StrandSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMegumi Smillie / Edina Jung vs Carol Mader / Christine Hegan6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTrisha Dugan / Jessica Kelly vs Takako Komatsuzaki / Cherie Rygh2-6, 0-6
2023-06-20vs NJ: StrandLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Gawley / Megumi Smillie vs Kimberly Derr / Maria Vitale3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Boiardi / Trisha Dugan vs Takako Komatsuzaki / Christine Hegan1-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs NJ: StrandLost 02
L#1 SinglesDanielle Cawood vs Melissa McCarthy4-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesSenta Cassell / Edina Jung vs Kimberly Derr / Maria Vitale5-7, 5-4, 1-0
2023-06-06vs NJ: StrandWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristy Gilbert vs Melissa McCarthy6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: Strand07161233266
2Love Em and Leave Em Again07121634262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Megumi Smillie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Wendy Boiardi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.00
Carole Allers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Kate Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Roge Nesbitt
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.79
Trisha Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Senta Cassell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Victoria Madonna
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.73
Bobby Choe
published 4
3.68
Julia Cho
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.65
Danielle Cawood
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Edina Jung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Fiona Strachan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Donovan
published
Kristy Gilbert
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lainie Goldstein
published
Lara Newman
published
Laura Gawley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lori Aroesty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Boiardi + Megumi Smillie13363% games+8.0% vs expected
Julia Cho + Wendy Boiardi191650% games−0.4% vs expected
Roge Nesbitt + Victoria Madonna1158752% games−0.5% vs expected
Fiona Strachan + Kate Jennings6449% games−3.3% vs expected
Trisha Dugan + Wendy Boiardi5648% games−8.4% vs expected
Kristy Gilbert + Edina Jung3260% gamesnot enough data
Laura Gawley + Wendy Boiardi404 matchesnot enough data
Carole Allers + Julia Cho404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Megumi Smillie
219W–84L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Wendy Boiardi
130W–85L career · 7 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Carole Allers
186W–140L career · 8 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Kate Jennings
99W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Roge Nesbitt
218W–147L career · 13 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
Trisha Dugan
28W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Senta Cassell
114W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Victoria Madonna
223W–148L career · 11 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Bobby Choe
268W–209L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Julia Cho
127W–102L career · 8 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Danielle Cawood
45W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Edina Jung
118W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Fiona Strachan
84W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Donovan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristy Gilbert
29W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lainie Goldstein
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lara Newman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Gawley
46W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Aroesty
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.