Teams

Team Eischeid

2025 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.5W

11 players · average NTRP 4.36 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-15vs Sports Mall-KastelerLost 12
L#1 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Tracey Valentine vs Ashley Park / Karin Smith7-6, 2-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Walzer vs Lynette Duran6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaty Alder / Christina Eischeid vs Linda Marz / Jennifer Hathaway4-6, 4-6
2025-12-08vs SL Tennis-KempWon 30
W#1 DoublesArashan Heikkila / Tracey Valentine vs Carlene Kemp / Emily Wallace6-3, 3-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Walzer vs Kecia Dallin6-4, 5-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Caldwell / Whitney Fautin vs Amy Hansen / Julie Cooley3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-12-01vs Eccles-JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Schulz / Heidi Gordon vs Cyndi Jones / Kristi Roggensack6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWhitney Fautin vs Meghan Clark6-3, 5-4
W#2 DoublesMandy Berg / Rosa McGuire vs Phoebe Hailey / Tina Smith6-4, 5-2
2025-11-17vs Sports Mall-KastelerWon 21
L#1 DoublesRosa McGuire / Arashan Heikkila vs Lynette Duran / Marissa Jackson2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Schulz vs Karin Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaty Alder / Christina Eischeid vs JaNae Smith / Jennifer Hathaway6-3, 6-4
2025-11-10vs SL Tennis-KempWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracey Valentine / Heidi Gordon vs Carlene Kemp / Kandice Taylor6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWhitney Fautin vs Kecia Dallin6-3, 3-1
L#2 DoublesMandy Berg / Stephanie Walzer vs Kathy Miller-Rees / Emily Wallace3-6, 2-6
2025-11-03vs Eccles-JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesWhitney Fautin / Arashan Heikkila vs Carey Hopkins / Lauren Hawley7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStephanie Walzer vs Cyndi Jones6-2, 5-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Schulz / Lisa Caldwell vs Lara Herrmann / Caroline Kent6-4, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Stephanie Walzer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Whitney Fautin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Arashan Heikkila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Christina Eischeid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Rosa McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Jessica Schulz
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Tracey Valentine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Heidi Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Mandy Berg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Katy Alder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Lisa Caldwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arashan Heikkila + Tracey Valentine10359% games+8.5% vs expected
Tracey Valentine + Heidi Gordon3252% games+6.7% vs expected
Mandy Berg + Rosa McGuire301162% games+4.0% vs expected
Mandy Berg + Lisa Caldwell3252% games+3.1% vs expected
Arashan Heikkila + Christina Eischeid5160% games−3.0% vs expected
Christina Eischeid + Rosa McGuire4159% gamesnot enough data
Katy Alder + Christina Eischeid224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Walzer + Heidi Gordon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephanie Walzer
82W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Whitney Fautin
191W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Arashan Heikkila
188W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Christina Eischeid
124W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Rosa McGuire
155W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Jessica Schulz
131W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
4.15
Tracey Valentine
95W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Heidi Gordon
98W–95L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Katy Alder
81W–81L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Lisa Caldwell
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.