Teams

CV-Palm Valley CC/Blair Stone

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesSusan Sacks / Marcia Howell vs Susan Caruso / Maria Himelman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBlair Stone / Anne Stein-Gray vs Lorraine Segala / Susan Hope2-6, 6-7
2021-03-22vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/L Hayes & LoratiSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarcia Howell / Susan Sacks vs Margo Barnard / Marylee Thexton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Jouet / Blair Stone vs Celeste Armitage / Paula Buononato4-6, 4-6
2021-03-15vs CV-Palm Desert Resort/L PriceWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarina Abbott / Dianne Dalton vs Rhonda Budlong-Reints / Lindsay Price6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarcia Howell / Susan Sacks vs Mona Knudslien / Janna Tipton6-3, 6-1
2021-03-08vs CV-Sun Lakes/M WalterWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarina Abbott / Dianne Dalton vs Catherine Leogrande / Tammy Pronenko6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarcia Howell / Blair Stone vs Sally Schwartz / Michele Walter7-5, 7-5
2021-03-01vs CV-Desert Princess/Pat BaughmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarina Abbott / Stephania Denton vs Patricia Baughman / Michele Weddle6-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesMarina Abbott / Dianne Dalton vs Marti Jablon / Karen Marcotte Solimano7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Jouet / Blair Stone vs Kanjamat Mullally / Meg Zoretic4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Sacks / Marcia Howell vs Teresa Makhijani / Holly Simmons0-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Carole Myser
published 4.5
3.40
Susan Sacks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Blair Stone
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Dianne Dalton
published 3.5
3.03
Stephania Denton
published
2.66
Anne Stein-Gray
published 3
Marcia Howell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 0
Marina Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Mary Jouet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Sacks + Marcia Howell4263% gamesnot enough data
Marina Abbott + Anne Stein-Gray213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Sacks + Blair Stone303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carole Myser
47W–56L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
4.02
3.5
Susan Sacks
116W–68L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Blair Stone
115W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Dianne Dalton
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Stephania Denton
16W–23L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Anne Stein-Gray
51W–25L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
0
Marcia Howell
45W–56L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Marina Abbott
17W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Jouet
12W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.