← Search

Marina Abbott

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
40 matches · 17W–23L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Marina sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Marina is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marina has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Marina has gone from the 20th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.1% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.6% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
L
2023-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Massoth
+0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hom
−0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Massoth
−0.007below expectation — took 42% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hom
−0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Massoth
−0.079below expectation — took 41% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2022-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Murray
−0.020below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Margaret Zimmerman
−0.013below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Zimmerman
−0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Zimmerman
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Betty Grant / Paula Buononato
2022-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Stein-Gray
−0.046below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Judy van Handel / Lillian Kinney
2022-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Stein-Gray
−0.020below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Julee Moore / Donna Simpson
2022-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Stein-Gray
+0.066better than expected — took 75% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.