Teams

LCTA18/Cole/Maybank

USTA 18 & over Tri-Level · 18 & Over 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-23vs LCTA18/Ryan-Coleman/MaybankWon 21
L#1 DoublesConstance Campbell / Savannah Wilhelm vs Lizzie Goddard / Elizabeth Stevens6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLindsay Eddy / Taylor Kent vs Halley Cella / Allison Ryan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJocelyn Mills / Linder Laffitte vs Ashley Pace / Tracey Zirneklis6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-13vs LCTA18/Anderson-Leahy/I’OnWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Zhang / Allyson Priddy vs Stephanie Leahy / Pamela Craft4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Kardohely / Taylor Kent vs MARY HOLTZ / Nancy Meyer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDenise Samson / Joanne Darkey vs Meghan Webster / Heidi Strenck6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-06vs LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. AndrewsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllyson Priddy / Cynthia Zhang vs Patricia Schuster / Kiley Dempsey6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Kardohely / Lindsay Eddy vs Suzie Zhang / Melissa Nehez Wingard6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMeaghan McIntyre / Linder Laffitte vs Li Rusterholz / Martha Koch6-7, 5-7
2025-06-01vs LCTA18/Biggs/MPRDLost 01
L#1 DoublesSavannah Wilhelm / Marie MacKey vs Rachel Kohler / Marcia Dickman5-7, 1-6
2025-05-16vs LCTA18/Le Cheminant/MPRWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Zhang / Marie MacKey vs Na Jin Seo / Katie Donahue7-5, 6-2
2025-05-06vs LCTA18/Courcoux/Snee FarmWon 21
W#1 DoublesElaina Cole / Allyson Priddy vs Lauren Courcoux / Ashley Carroll6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Kardohely / Hailey Coleman vs Paige Hill / Tracey Frank6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoanne Darkey / Meaghan McIntyre vs Stephanie Godfrey / Jennifer Smith1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cynthia Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Elaina Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Taylor Kent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Constance Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Allyson Priddy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Savannah Wilhelm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Caitlin Kardohely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Katy Shahid
published
3.56
Amber Oblinger
published 4
3.47
Marie MacKey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Lindsay Eddy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Jocelyn Mills
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Meaghan McIntyre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Denise Samson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Joanne Darkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Cecilia Wulbern
published 3
Hailey Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linder Laffitte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Haney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Zhang + Taylor Kent20371% games+13.4% vs expected
Amber Oblinger + Caitlin Kardohely5255% games+13.4% vs expected
Amber Oblinger + Constance Campbell6356% games+4.8% vs expected
Constance Campbell + Savannah Wilhelm3347% games−5.0% vs expected
Cynthia Zhang + Linder Laffitte4170% gamesnot enough data
Linder Laffitte + Taylor Kent5081% gamesnot enough data
Savannah Wilhelm + Meaghan McIntyre134 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Eddy + Cynthia Zhang404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Zhang
85W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Elaina Cole
58W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Taylor Kent
79W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Constance Campbell
77W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Allyson Priddy
48W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Savannah Wilhelm
35W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Caitlin Kardohely
46W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Katy Shahid
18W–18L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Amber Oblinger
49W–22L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Marie MacKey
46W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Lindsay Eddy
58W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jocelyn Mills
45W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Meaghan McIntyre
51W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Denise Samson
50W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Joanne Darkey
35W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Cecilia Wulbern
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Hailey Coleman
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Linder Laffitte
107W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Haney
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.