Teams

Ad.Dailey18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-30vs Ma.Gregson18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Dailey / Jonathan Adams vs Jim Riddick / Stephen Holmes1-6, 4-6
2024-04-23vs Dy.DeMacy18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoe Neylan / Max Stevenson vs Curt Miller / Jeff Chaffin6-4, 6-4
2024-04-16vs Je.Monaghen18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoe Neylan / Howard Marsilio vs Jeffrey Monaghen / Philip Gugliotta6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAdam Dailey vs Scott Arra6-1, 6-2
2024-04-02vs Jo.Brown18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Dailey / Joe Neylan vs Kevin Wolborsky / Pete Padilla6-2, 6-3
2024-03-19vs Ry.Berliner18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesAdam Dailey / Scott Russell vs Aubry Carmody / Blake Hardwick6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoe Neylan / Matthew Horney vs Nicholas Lau / Nick Gilder2-6, 4-6
2024-03-05vs Je.Brooks18AWon 10
W#3 DoublesAdam Dailey / Joe Neylan vs Chris Mauro / Ken Glanville5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Max Stevenson
published
3.98
Scott Underwood
published
3.92
Adam Dailey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Joe Neylan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Matthew Horney
published
3.79
Ryan Lindsay
published
3.74
Sterling Thomas
published
3.73
Jonathan Adams
published
3.69
Bradford Minsley
published 4
3.68
Howard Marsilio
published
3.61
Lloyd Brown
published
3.54
Clifton Minsley
published 4
3.51
Jordan Yelverton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Horney + Joe Neylan6055% games+0.5% vs expected
Adam Dailey + Joe Neylan7458% gamesnot enough data
Adam Dailey + Lloyd Brown303 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Horney + Sterling Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Stevenson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.14
Scott Underwood
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Adam Dailey
148W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Joe Neylan
106W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
Matthew Horney
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Ryan Lindsay
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Sterling Thomas
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Jonathan Adams
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bradford Minsley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Howard Marsilio
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Lloyd Brown
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Clifton Minsley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jordan Yelverton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.