Teams

Team 6 RBGCC

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-16vs Team 10 Serve AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesAaron Berkey / Emil Valle vs Jeffrey Gill / JR Carreras0-6, 0-6
2025-02-26vs Team 5 Belle Haven 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMel Wesley / Michael Oakes vs Anthony Coco / Andrew Duke3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-19vs Team 12 ChallengersLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmil Valle / Mel Wesley vs Scott Johnson / Jeff Bolyard7-5, 3-5, 0-1
2025-02-12vs Team 3 Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmil Valle / Robert Finch vs Ethan Cebulash / Ryan Poole3-6, 4-5
2025-02-05vs Team 8 WGCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJack Kerrigan / Mel Wesley vs Josh MacFarland / Matt Carlson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmil Valle / Michael Oakes vs Jim Thomas / Mark Allen3-6, 4-6
2025-01-29vs Team 2 District AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMel Wesley / Wayne Chopus vs Jonathan Ramseur / Robert Wagoner0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-22vs Team 4 Lord of the StringsLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmil Valle / Michael Oakes vs Ben Jackson / Arvind Jairam1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMel Wesley / Mario Levine vs Troy Davig / Dino Constantino4-6, 0-6
2025-01-15vs Team 13 TrailblazersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMel Wesley / Emil Valle vs Frank Pan / Jesse Porch6-4, 6-0
2025-01-08vs Team 11 CourtmastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMario Levine / Mel Wesley vs Vijay Kalanadhabhatta / THUC NGUYEN1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sohale Razmjou
published
3.26
Mel Wesley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Mario Levine
published
3.03
Robert Finch
published
2.77
Emil Valle
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emil Valle + Mel Wesley9459% gamesnot enough data
Mel Wesley + Mario Levine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sohale Razmjou
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Mel Wesley
145W–106L career · 12 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Robert Finch
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Emil Valle
52W–85L career · 13 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.