Teams

Team 12 Challengers

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-29vs Team 11 CourtmastersLost 01
L#2 DoublesRon Haimowitz / Bruce Henshel vs Louis Dupuis / Joel Velasquez4-6, 3-6
2025-03-22vs Team 4 Lord of the StringsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Ron Haimowitz vs Mark Chu / Sebastian Weathersby1-6, 2-4
2025-03-15vs Team 13 TrailblazersWon 10
W#3 DoublesBruce Henshel / Ben Moss vs David Parks / Michael Porturica6-4, 6-1
2025-02-19vs Team 6 RBGCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesBruce Henshel / Ron Haimowitz vs Robert Finch / Michael Oakes6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Johnson / Jeff Bolyard vs Emil Valle / Mel Wesley5-7, 5-3, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Team 9 CrossSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJeff Bolyard / Carlo Pizarro vs Biggs Cannon / Bryant Springer1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Henshel / Ben Moss vs Mark Murphy / John Sherner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Henshel / Ron Haimowitz vs John Williamson / Anthony Chang4-6, 4-6
2025-01-07vs Team 5 Belle Haven 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlo Pizarro / Albert Crenshaw vs Anthony Coco / Chris Meyer2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Moss
published 3.5
3.23
Carlo Pizarro
published 3.5
3.11
Paul Henry
published
3.08
Bruce Henshel
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Jeff Bolyard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Albert Crenshaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Kevin Koo
published
2.82
John Sobieray
published
Ted Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Crenshaw + Jeff Bolyard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ben Moss
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carlo Pizarro
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Paul Henry
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Bruce Henshel
16W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Jeff Bolyard
13W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Albert Crenshaw
54W–159L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Kevin Koo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
John Sobieray
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Ted Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.