Teams

Team 4 Lord of the Strings

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-24vs Team 7 PiF Winter 3.5 (40)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSebastian Weathersby / Mark Chu vs Anthony Chang / Marc Sendich6-3, 5-3
2025-03-22vs Team 12 ChallengersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Chu / Sebastian Weathersby vs Albert Crenshaw / Ron Haimowitz6-1, 4-2
W#2 DoublesMatias Piaggio / Jeff Stensland vs Ted Kim / Kevin Koo6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTaylor Lewis / Arvind Jairam vs Ben Moss / John Sobieray6-3, 6-4
2025-03-18vs Team 5 Belle Haven 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Dupuy / Ashwin Vengu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTaylor Lewis / Arvind Jairam vs Stephen Reynolds / Robert Costello6-3, 6-4
2025-03-15vs Team 3 Who Is We? EvolutionSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKenneth Kawahara / Matias Piaggio vs Mike Ly / Luo Dong2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBen Jackson / Arturo Garcia Alonso vs Warren Chen / Hoa Nguyen7-6, 4-2
2025-02-22vs Team 10 Serve AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesBen Jackson / Chris Cruzcosa vs Nabil Ghadiali / John Murray6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTaylor Lewis / Arturo Garcia Alonso vs Brian Barnett / Zachary Zurich6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTroy Davig / Stephen Dupuy vs Eric Hopkins / Brett Woerner3-6, 6-5
2025-01-25vs Team 8 WGCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesArvind Jairam / Dino Constantino vs Mark Allen / Michael Petron6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Morris / Mark Chu vs Matt Carlson / Josh MacFarland0-6, 6-7
2025-01-22vs Team 6 RBGCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBen Jackson / Arvind Jairam vs Emil Valle / Michael Oakes6-1, 6-2
2025-01-17vs Team 2 District AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesBen Jackson / Chris Cruzcosa vs STEPHEN ROMIG / Jeremy Symons6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesArturo Garcia Alonso / Jeff Stensland vs Ando Shin / Alex Freiman6-1, 6-3
2025-01-08vs Team 13 TrailblazersWon 20
W#1 DoublesArvind Jairam / Dino Constantino vs Tom Do / Benedict Moon6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJed Wolfington / Matias Piaggio vs Frank Pan / Michael Porturica7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Arvind Jairam
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.83
Kenneth Kawahara
published
3.68
Taylor Lewis
published
3.66
Ben Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.62
Dino Constantino
published
3.46
Matias Piaggio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Sebastian Weathersby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Tarun Hingorani
published
3.38
Chris Cruzcosa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Mark Chu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Daniel Morris
published 3.5
3.32
Arturo Garcia Alonso
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Ashwin Vengu
published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Dupuy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Jed Wolfington
published
3.15
Jeff Stensland
published
3.09
Troy Davig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Stensland + Matias Piaggio4163% games+9.6% vs expected
Arturo Garcia Alonso + Matias Piaggio4248% games+0.4% vs expected
Daniel Morris + Jeff Stensland2349% games−6.0% vs expected
Arvind Jairam + Ben Jackson5265% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Dupuy + Chris Cruzcosa303 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Lewis + Kenneth Kawahara213 matchesnot enough data
Arturo Garcia Alonso + Chris Cruzcosa213 matchesnot enough data
Arvind Jairam + Chris Cruzcosa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arvind Jairam
116W–62L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Kenneth Kawahara
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Taylor Lewis
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Ben Jackson
61W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
Dino Constantino
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
3.5
Matias Piaggio
49W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Sebastian Weathersby
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Tarun Hingorani
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Chris Cruzcosa
56W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
4
Mark Chu
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Daniel Morris
60W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Arturo Garcia Alonso
77W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Ashwin Vengu
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Stephen Dupuy
72W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jed Wolfington
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Jeff Stensland
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Troy Davig
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.