Teams

Abels/Hayworth TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 Thurs

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 55 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-27vs Collins TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 01
L#1 DoublesMimi Cartee / Libby Strickland vs Deborah Register / Leanne Rosenbower6-7, 3-6
2023-07-06vs Billings TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursWon 10
W#2 DoublesGinger Hayworth / Pamela Aikens vs Britt Flanagan / Laura Ambler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-29vs Bethel TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 01
L#3 DoublesRose Chrismon / Myra Propst vs Elaine Ashley / Mariann Van Ryen6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-22vs Collins TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 02
L#2 DoublesGinger Hayworth / Rose Chrismon vs Kimberly Gay / Cheryl Scott2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Monica Medina-Murphy vs Linda Hestenes / Lauren Collins0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesMartha Fogleman / Libby Strickland vs Catherine Tanner / Shawn McFarlin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-01vs Billings TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarie-Lyne Lavoie / Libby Strickland vs Keevie Martin / Gwenda Priest2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGinger Hayworth / Betsey Wells vs Aprille Black / Emily Wilson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Susan Wrenn vs Melinda Billings / Laura Ambler1-6, 1-6
2023-05-25vs Bethel TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarie-Lyne Lavoie / Libby Strickland vs Cynthia Sarwi / Vicky Bethel4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Rose Chrismon vs Mariann Van Ryen / Betty Smith2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.32
Martha Fogleman
published
3.27
Jean Pudlo
published
Ginger Hayworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Pamela Aikens
published
3.19
Betsey Wells
published 3.5
Cathy Taney
published 3
2.72
2.66
Susan Wrenn
published
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
Susan Abels
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Jean Pudlo
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ginger Hayworth
88W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Aikens
19W–36L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Betsey Wells
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Cathy Taney
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monica Medina-Murphy
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Susan Wrenn
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
Myra Propst
147W–178L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.47
Susan Abels
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.