Teams

Billings TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 Thurs

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 55 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-27vs Bethel TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauran Epstein / Emily Wilson vs Mary Jane Tarver / Anne Thornton4-6, 5-7
2023-07-20vs Collins TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauran Epstein / Emily Wilson vs Lori Harrington / Kelly Pryzwansky6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-22vs Bethel TRI55 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 01
L#2 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Emily Wilson vs Floy Collis / Mary Jane Tarver2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAprille Black / Emily Wilson vs Ginger Hayworth / Betsey Wells6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Carole Albright
published 4
3.60
Emmy Biaggi
published 3.5
3.54
Gwenda Priest
published 4
3.46
Keevie Martin
published
3.31
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.30
Lauran Epstein
published
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Samantha Stichter
published
2.75
Laura Ambler
published
2.69
Linda Widman
published
Margaret Fairbank
published
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emmy Biaggi + Emily Wilson314 matchesnot enough data
Emily Wilson + Lauran Epstein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carole Albright
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Emmy Biaggi
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
4
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Lauran Epstein
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Samantha Stichter
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
Laura Ambler
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Linda Widman
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Margaret Fairbank
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda Billings
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.