Teams

40-Love

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.56 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-05-20vs Shot SistersLost 01
L#1 SinglesCari Massie vs Dawna Buckingham0-6, 0-6
2021-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesLindy McDonald / Amalia Ciniglio vs Marnie Newton / Carole Wolff7-6, 6-2
2021-05-16vs 4Ever YoursLost 01
L#2 DoublesCari Massie / Tracy Pham vs Ellen Kennedy / Trang Pham4-6, 5-7
2021-05-13vs Over ServedLost 02
L#1 DoublesDana Rusin / Lindy McDonald vs Shelley Ware / Margie Waddel2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCari Massie vs Patty Jackson1-6, 2-6
2021-05-11vs 40 and FabbiulousLost 02
L#1 SinglesCari Massie vs Sandra Andersen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLindy McDonald / Amalia Ciniglio vs Joy Blomberg / Robin Fisher6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCari Massie vs Cindy Walker1-6, 3-6
2021-05-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmalia Ciniglio / Lindy McDonald vs Molly Schafer / Betty Peterson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-27vs #hit itLost 02
L#1 SinglesCari Massie vs Vicki McBride1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmalia Ciniglio / Lindy McDonald vs Leann Gilberg / Jennifer Mitchell1-6, 2-6
2021-04-15vs LadytennisityLost 01
L#2 DoublesCari Massie / Amy Mikkelson vs Janet Wilson / Kathy Christensen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-13vs Eagle GalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCari Massie / Christy Siemons vs Debbie Davies / Vicki Osweiler0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindy McDonald / Amalia Ciniglio vs Katheryn Burriesci / RaQuel Montgomery1-6, 4-6
2021-04-06vs Casual SetsLost 02
L#1 SinglesCari Massie vs Katie Scanlan3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmalia Ciniglio / Lindy McDonald vs Becky Gordon / Maria Heffner5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lunatic Fringe112421027357
2Ladytennisity112381438409
3Shot Sisters112351745431
4Sets Appeal94292350423
540 and Fabbiulous85312151434
6#hit it85272560471
7Over Served76302253438
8Eagle Gals67272562482
94Ever Yours58252764485
10Casual Sets310193375518
11Each Hit 4.031084490578
12Sharks211173578542
1340-Love01334999613

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Brijean Brennan
published 4
Amy Mikkelson
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Michele Inghram
published 3.5
Cari Massie
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.19
Christy Siemons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.18
Dana Rusin
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
2.99
Amalia Ciniglio
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.74
Katherine Bruno
published 3
Deanna Miller
usually #3 Doubles 85%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published
Kelly Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published
Lindy McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Tracy Pham
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Rusin + Michele Inghram82837% games−2.3% vs expected
Dana Rusin + Christy Siemons3645% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Bruno + Deanna Miller0819% gamesnot enough data
Lindy McDonald + Amalia Ciniglio1545% gamesnot enough data
Brijean Brennan + Tracy Pham044 matchesnot enough data
Brijean Brennan + Amy Mikkelson224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Mikkelson + Kelly Mooney044 matchesnot enough data
Michele Inghram + Kelly Mooney224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brijean Brennan
153W–118L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Amy Mikkelson
102W–91L career · 16 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Michele Inghram
147W–119L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Cari Massie
46W–96L career · type S · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Christy Siemons
78W–79L career · 10 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dana Rusin
88W–106L career · 17 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Amalia Ciniglio
1W–13L career · type S · 6 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Katherine Bruno
43W–73L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Deanna Miller
12W–38L career · 13 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Mooney
19W–21L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindy McDonald
9W–23L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracy Pham
35W–61L career · 19 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.