Teams

Each Hit 4.0

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.61 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-05-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRenae Rainwater vs Patty Jackson2-6, 5-7
2021-05-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesHanna McGee / Renae Rainwater vs Brijean Brennan / Tracy Pham4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartina Allen / Leslie Hughes vs Dana Rusin / Michele Inghram2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-13vs 40 and FabbiulousLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartina Allen / Zel Mertz vs Maryann Moorhead / Meg Markley3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesHanna McGee vs Connie Bartich2-6, 1-6
2021-05-11vs Sets AppealLost 01
L#1 DoublesMartina Allen / Zel Mertz vs Margot Gilna / Susan Schossberger2-6, 2-6
2021-05-06vs SharksWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartina Allen / Zel Mertz vs Kara Taggart / Debbie Spoja6-2, 6-4
2021-05-04vs Lunatic FringeLost 01
L#1 SinglesHanna McGee vs Joanne Cornwell1-6, 4-6
2021-04-29vs #hit itLost 01
L#1 DoublesHanna McGee / Renae Rainwater vs Jane Perlaky / Erin Perry5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-28vs LadytennisityLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartina Allen / Trudy Fouser vs Debra Davis-Johnson / Yuzhu Zheng4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRenae Rainwater vs Denise Schwendener3-6, 1-6
2021-04-27vs 4Ever YoursLost 01
L#1 DoublesMartina Allen / Zel Mertz vs Danielle Stoddard / Maria Turner1-6, 0-6
2021-04-15vs Eagle GalsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartina Allen / Renae Rainwater vs Christina Peterman / Suzanne Lindskog6-3, 6-1
2021-04-13vs Babble AlotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartina Allen / Hanna McGee vs Beth Calvo / Kelley Cooper6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRenae Rainwater vs Suzanne Baran5-7, 6-7
2021-04-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHanna McGee / Renae Rainwater vs Hillary Lilya / Kimberly Shansby3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-06vs Shot SistersLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenae Rainwater / Zel Mertz vs Lisa Hilde / Katey Hakes3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lunatic Fringe112421027357
2Ladytennisity112381438409
3Shot Sisters112351745431
4Sets Appeal94292350423
540 and Fabbiulous85312151434
6#hit it85272560471
7Over Served76302253438
8Eagle Gals67272562482
94Ever Yours58252764485
10Casual Sets310193375518
11Each Hit 4.031084490578
12Sharks211173578542
1340-Love01334999613

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Mary Burke
published 4
3.57
Heidi Stipp
published 4
3.51
Anna Orrison
published 3.5
3.39
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.34
Trudy Fouser
published 3.5
Carole Wolff
published 3.5
Gini Rosandick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Marnie Newton
published 3.5
3.17
Elaine Remley
published 3.5
Hanna McGee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Leslie Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Martina Allen
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Renae Rainwater
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marnie Newton + Zel Mertz5361% games+5.2% vs expected
Zel Mertz + Anna Orrison18559% games+2.9% vs expected
Mary Burke + Elaine Remley211057% games+0.8% vs expected
Marnie Newton + Anna Orrison10755% games−3.9% vs expected
Martina Allen + Zel Mertz52340% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Hughes + Anna Orrison16853% gamesnot enough data
Gini Rosandick + Marnie Newton41040% gamesnot enough data
Gini Rosandick + Elaine Remley2637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Burke
151W–103L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Heidi Stipp
166W–109L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Anna Orrison
242W–148L career · no lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Zel Mertz
335W–191L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Trudy Fouser
63W–78L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Carole Wolff
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gini Rosandick
39W–48L career · 14 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Marnie Newton
214W–184L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elaine Remley
56W–51L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.17
Hanna McGee
4W–10L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Leslie Hughes
37W–28L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Martina Allen
19W–39L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Renae Rainwater
19W–43L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.