Teams

Ma.Altneu18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-31vs Sk.Poole18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Jenna Huggins4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Stephanie Disbrow7-6
2024-06-27vs Er.McAllister18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Laura Rendon6-0, 6-1
2024-06-20vs Me.Golder18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Elena Pinkus5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-18vs Em.Johnson18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Rachael Kiker6-7, 3-6
2024-05-30vs De.Lape18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Button Hall6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Deanna Lape6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Lindsay Murdock
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
4.03
Mallory Biringer
published 4
3.92
Erin Farleigh
published 4
3.87
Leigh Barter
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.76
Laura Capps
published
3.58
Meggy Campbell
published
3.50
Amanda Lindsay
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Farleigh + Lindsay Murdock134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lindsay Murdock
150W–62L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Mallory Biringer
105W–49L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Erin Farleigh
25W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
Laura Capps
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Meggy Campbell
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Amanda Lindsay
35W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.