Teams

CV-Palm Springs TC/Hoffman

2024 SCTA SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-14vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/PotterWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanice Campbell / Monica McCready vs Cheryl Capriola / Pamela Milroy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-30vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/MatkinLost 03
L#1 DoublesDoris Hoffmann / Monica McCready vs Mary Kaump / Mariell Tomasovich2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs Ashley Matkin / Tammy Pronenko2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanie Erickson / Merri Wells vs Meg Maloney / Kelly Diamond4-6, 4-6
2024-11-23vs CV-La Quinta Resort/L MorganLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanice Campbell / Celeste Armitage vs Lisa Morgan / Cathy Evangelist3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-13vs CV-Palm Desert TC/CannonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMonica McCready / Doris Hoffmann vs Kimberly Skorupa / Deborah Orange3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Merri Wells vs Janelle Washington / Donna Wrigley1-6, 1-6
2024-11-09vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/PotterLost 02
L#2 DoublesTerri Mead / Merri Wells vs Susan Brooks / Gianna Riley1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWanda Ramos / Julie Exley vs Nancy Closson / Jill Lawrence Polls1-6, 3-6
2024-11-02vs CV-Palm Desert TC/CannonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDoris Hoffmann / Monica McCready vs Lori Irwin / Mistie Iseman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMerri Wells / Terri Mead vs Debra Bennett / Merrie Vieco5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Jaramillo / Wanda Ramos vs Kimberly Skorupa / Donna Wrigley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-26vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/MatkinLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Mead / Celeste Armitage vs Tammy Pronenko / Mariell Tomasovich6-7, 4-6
2024-10-19vs CV-La Quinta Resort/L MorganWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica McCready / Doris Hoffmann vs Sally Mangina / Marjo Hull7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Amy Springer
published 4
3.75
Ginny Ehrlich
published
3.73
Maureen Jaramillo
published
3.67
Celeste Armitage
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Merri Wells
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Celeste Manolas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Doris Hoffmann
published
3.37
Janie Erickson
published
3.32
Wanda Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Kathalena Cocker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janice Campbell
published
Julie Exley
published
Monica McCready
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Caruso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Armitage + Janice Campbell41040% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Ramos + Monica McCready4255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Springer
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
Ginny Ehrlich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Maureen Jaramillo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Celeste Armitage
70W–83L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Merri Wells
70W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Celeste Manolas
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Doris Hoffmann
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Janie Erickson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Wanda Ramos
74W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Kathalena Cocker
135W–140L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Janice Campbell
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Exley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica McCready
92W–63L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Caruso
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.