Teams

Cottonwood Club-Special K

2025 Winter League-Saturday · 2.5W Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 2.69 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-15vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin Rocke / Kristin Hutchins vs Hailey Jensen / Jenna DeLong6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Bretz / Elise Matthews vs Rebecca Rynders / Karen Weyman4-6, 3-6
2025-03-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-Chytraus/WeeksLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Sweetland / Kristin Hutchins vs Cristina Cook / Christina Montero3-6, 5-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Sparks / Kristin Bretz vs Ashley Theodore / Tiffany Rodriguez6-3, 3-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHolly Ricker / Brittany Pope vs Stacy Harbertson / Shelby Hales6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-01vs Salt Lake Tennis-WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Rocke / Kristine Johnson vs Pat Williams / Mari Bickmore2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Harrison / Lindsay Sparks vs Carissa Monroy / Lisa Sehy2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Miska / Elise Matthews vs Rayna Lofgren / Sabrina Vienneau6-4, 4-3
2025-02-22vs Liberty Park Tennis-En FuegoLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrittany Pope / Kristin Bretz vs Katie Rose / Trena Anderson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Rocke / Kristine Johnson vs Ann Monroy / Shelly Kaihatu0-6, 5-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristina Maljovec / Kristin Hutchins vs Debbie Beckstrom / Mindy Wilson6-1, 6-2
2025-02-01vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Sparks / Kristine Johnson vs Meghan Boyd / Tejaswini Vaidya2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKristin Bretz / Brittany Pope vs Jenna DeLong / Karen Weyman0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElise Matthews / Crystal Connors vs Madison Milligan / Anna Eschler3-6, 1-6
2025-01-25vs Liberty Park Tennis-Chytraus/WeeksLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristine Johnson / Carrie Peterson vs Christina Montero / Sandy Weeks3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Sweetland / Crystal Connors vs Ali Love / Kimberly Chytraus1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Hutchins / Kristin Bretz vs Cristina Cook / Heather Wissler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Brittany Pope
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Kristina Maljovec
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Lisa Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Holly Ricker
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.50
Kristin Hutchins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Kristin Bretz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.38
Carrie Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.32
Kylee Bryson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elise Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Emily Miska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Crystal Connors
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.18
Kristin Rocke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.03
Sandra Sweetland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.99
Lindsay Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Hanrahan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Peterson + Crystal Connors3256% games+15.6% vs expected
Kristin Hutchins + Kristin Bretz5157% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Bretz + Crystal Connors3255% gamesnot enough data
Holly Ricker + Brittany Pope134 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Rocke + Lisa Harrison134 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Rocke + Brittany Pope314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Sparks + Crystal Connors134 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Rocke + Kristin Hutchins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brittany Pope
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Kristina Maljovec
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Lisa Harrison
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
0%48%52%
2.50
3
Holly Ricker
58W–151L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kristin Hutchins
17W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Kristin Bretz
18W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Carrie Peterson
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
Kylee Bryson
22W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Elise Matthews
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Emily Miska
2W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Crystal Connors
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Kristin Rocke
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Sandra Sweetland
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Lindsay Sparks
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Megan Hanrahan
16W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.