Teams

ED MITCHELL PK 40MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Chandra Mahadevan
published 4.5
3.95
Venu Bojja
published
3.94
Chris Eaton
published 4
3.82
Kamesh Vedula
published
3.81
3.74
Matt Fecteau
published
3.62
Amandeep Kaur
published 4
3.60
Amit Srivastava
published 4
3.52
Sumit Singh
published
3.51
Karin Shelton
published
3.48
Vivek Narra
published
3.44
Heather Reeves
published
3.43
Eric Morita
published
3.41
Kendra Stanfill
published
3.30
Nicole Roseveare
published
3.30
Shizuka Wire
published
3.27
Jinny Beaton-Le
published
3.26
Molly Huckabay
published
3.20
Denise Canacari
published 3.5
3.20
Carly Singleton
published 3.5
3.17
Diem Le
published 3.5
3.14
Duffy Kelly
published
2.71
Antonette Clark
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Canacari + Chandra Mahadevan134 matchesnot enough data
Kamesh Vedula + Shizuka Wire303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chandra Mahadevan
4W–21L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Venu Bojja
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Chris Eaton
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
Kamesh Vedula
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Gudapati Tulasi Ramanna
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Matt Fecteau
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Amandeep Kaur
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Amit Srivastava
4W–21L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Sumit Singh
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Karin Shelton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
Vivek Narra
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Heather Reeves
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Eric Morita
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kendra Stanfill
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Nicole Roseveare
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Shizuka Wire
19W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.30
Jinny Beaton-Le
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Molly Huckabay
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Denise Canacari
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carly Singleton
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Diem Le
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Duffy Kelly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Antonette Clark
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.