Teams

NUNDKUMAR 18s 4.0W Thurs AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-24vs Kraska/Bettinger 18s 4.0W Thurs AMLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarla Barnwell / Anna Mickleberry vs Morgan Danford / Theresa Dockrill2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKara Jacobs / Anna Lackey vs Lauren Varkey / Catherine Tanner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Dover vs Elisabeth Kraska7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Hill / Mary Sexton vs Leslie Marus / Lindsay Olin0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Marla Barnwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Leigh Abraham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.79
Penny Trivette
published
3.78
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.77
Anna Mickleberry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anna Lackey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Julie Dover
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.64
3.64
Angela McGinn
published 4
3.60
Tammy Kasik
published
3.59
Maggie Riley
published
3.50
Mary Sexton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kara Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Broadstreet + Sara Nundkumar0535% gamesnot enough data
Marla Barnwell + Sara Nundkumar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marla Barnwell
41W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Leigh Abraham
29W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
Penny Trivette
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Sara Nundkumar
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Anna Mickleberry
28W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Anna Lackey
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Danielle Broadstreet
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Angela McGinn
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Tammy Kasik
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Maggie Riley
52W–49L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Mary Sexton
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kara Jacobs
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.