Teams

Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S

2023 DTA N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

22 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Summers
published 4.5
4.02
Meg Lohr
published
3.98
Sarah Sparling
published
3.97
Michelle Marketos
published
3.88
3.87
Ann Thornton
published 4
3.77
Lola Lott
published
3.77
Christine Rogers
published 4
3.77
Marci Addington
published
3.76
Tanya Musick
published
3.75
Erica Whiteway
published 4
3.75
Jacky Pincoffs
published 4
3.75
Lisa Nammari
published
3.69
Devon Bowling
published 4
3.68
Jill McGill
published
3.65
Courtney Kunz
published 4
3.58
Cassi Cole
published 4
3.58
Angie Woltjen
published 4
3.57
Heather Neilson
published 4
3.50
Brenda Talavera
published 4
3.22
Erin Shreiner
published 3.5
Sonia Browne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Nammari + Meg Lohr10175% games+18.0% vs expected
Christine Rogers + Erica Whiteway3654% games+13.4% vs expected
Christine Rogers + Tanya Musick10357% games+6.7% vs expected
Tanya Musick + Sarah Sparling8558% games+5.9% vs expected
Christine Rogers + Sarah Sparling4258% games+3.8% vs expected
Cassi Cole + Erica Whiteway4351% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Nammari + Ann Thornton5158% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Musick + Courtney Kunz5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Summers
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Lohr
53W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
4.02
Sarah Sparling
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
Michelle Marketos
33W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
Vincentia Onuegbulem
30W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Ann Thornton
51W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
Lola Lott
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christine Rogers
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Marci Addington
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Tanya Musick
30W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Erica Whiteway
39W–24L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Jacky Pincoffs
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Lisa Nammari
36W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Devon Bowling
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Jill McGill
37W–14L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Courtney Kunz
22W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Cassi Cole
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Angie Woltjen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Heather Neilson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Brenda Talavera
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Erin Shreiner
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Sonia Browne
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.