Teams

V - LLW PRC MixedHighTri-K Garland

2022 SoCal Mixed Tri-Level 18 &Over-Ventura · Ventura - Mixed 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-30vs V - Wood Ranch Mixed TroublesLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlan Siu / Nahed Stefany vs Joe Bolter / Sandy Hutchins6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-16vs V - Sunset MixersWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlan Siu / Nahed Stefany vs Tony Green / Mia de Leon6-2, 6-2
2022-10-09vs V - Las Posas Next LevelLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeremy Tuite / Keressa Garland vs Sharon Erickson / William Dobbins1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-17vs V - Wood Ranch Mixed TroublesWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlan Siu / Nahed Stefany vs Cory Rodrigues / Lisa Brady6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeremy Tuite / Keressa Garland vs Peter DiPasquale / Patricia Ameca6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Mixed 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Richard Geib
published
4.16
Julio Cabral
published
4.12
Laine Miller
published
4.09
Alan Siu
published 4.5
4.04
Nahed Stefany
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Jeremy Tuite
published
4.00
Jennifer Lawler
published
3.74
Darcy Antonellis
published 4
3.72
3.68
Mike Powers
published
3.63
Ann Gallimore
published 4
3.32
Michael Garland
published
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Geib
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
Julio Cabral
11W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
Laine Miller
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alan Siu
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Nahed Stefany
267W–157L career · 3 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Jeremy Tuite
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
Jennifer Lawler
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
4.00
4
Darcy Antonellis
17W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Debra Blackwell-Schrag
143W–98L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Mike Powers
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Ann Gallimore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Michael Garland
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.